Research Article: 2021 Vol: 25 Issue: 4S
Nathier A. Ibrahim, Al-Turath University College
Layla M. Nassir, Al-Mustansiriya University
The world population increased from (1800) million to (7.7) billion, and the population growth rate decreased from (2.2 %) annually during the last fifty years to (1.05 %). The improvement in the health situation leads to a decrease in the mortality rate, especially infant mortality, which leads to an increase in the population. The decline in population growth rate depends mainly on fertility rates. The main lesson of demographic transformations indicates that countries seek to reduce population growth rates by reducing the global fertility rate, thus the world will be in the next few decades in the end of rapid population growth. U N publications were used in this paper to analyze the challenges and transitions in various demographic data, in addition to that we use Malthusian model to get the predicting growth rate for several years. Data related to (Covid 19) epidemic, which killed millions of people and its impact on population growth, was also analyzed.
Growth Rate, Global Population, Malthusian Growth Rate, Fertility Rate, Mortality Rate, Childbearing Rate.
The population division of United Nations provides accurate data on population growth and demographic development in various fields in the world. United Nations statistics indicated that due to the decline in mortality rates and global health development over the past century, the world population has more than quadrupled and the impact on the natural environment, therefore, countries plan to provide sustainable resources to their countries in light of the great challenges, especially health ones.
Population growth is still rapid, especially in poor countries or third-world countries with limited income. Population growth peaked at the beginning of the seventies of the last century by (2.1 %) then began to slow down until it reached approximately (1 %) annually as a result of adopting birth control policies and reducing fertility rates in many countries to control the adequacy of their economic resources. According to United Nations forecasts, the population growth rate will drop to (0.1%) at the end of this century, and no one knows what will happen after (2100).
Societies that were transformed from predominantly rural and agricultural societies to prohibitive societies in which there was a decline in fertility rates as a result of the general culture in the new society, for example, the countries of Western Europe, Soviet Union, United States, Canada and some Latin American countries, this were helped by medical technologies that got a reduction in fertility and childbearing rates. This paper is an attempt to shed light on some demographic data within United Nations publications and analyze its data statistically, in addition to using Malthus models for prediction. Moreover, discussing the impact of (Covid-19) on growth rate using updates (WHO) data for the same.
We will discuss and analyze some figures comes in the main data of U N publications which shown in tables below, table (1) shows that the highest population is China (1,444,500,951) ranked as (18.5%) from global population, then India with (1,392,775,219), ranked (17.9 %), from the same, that means the two countries ranked (36.4 %) from global population. The last top twenty is Thailand, which ranked (0.009 %). The population of total top twenty countries is (5,512,392,526) ranked (70.7%) from the global population.
Table 1 Twenty Highest Population Countries |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Country | Population | Country | Population | ||
1 | China | 1,44,45,00,951 | 11 | Japan | 12,61,20,142 |
2 | India | 1,39,27,75,219 | 12 | Ethiopia | 11,77,16,155 |
3 | U.S.A. | 33,28,16,975 | 13 | Philippines | 11,09,62,347 |
4 | Indonesia | 27,62,49,643 | 14 | Egypt | 10,41,80,382 |
5 | Pakistan | 22,49,98,561 | 15 | Vietnam | 9,81,61,749 |
6 | Brazil | 21,39,74,863 | 16 | D.R. Congo | 9,22,20,564 |
7 | Nigeria | 21,10,78,301 | 17 | Turkey | 8,51,94,694 |
8 | Bangladesh | 16,62,34,138 | 18 | Germany | 8,40,33,194 |
9 | Russia | 14,59,92,401 | 19 | Iran | 8,50,10,178 |
10 | Mexico | 13,02,09,331 | 20 | Thailand | 69962738 |
The world population has increased during the past sixty-five years from (2,773,019,936) to (7,794,798,739) also there is a clear increase in the annual change of the population during the same period, while the rate of change was in a decreasing pattern, which shows that the high population growth is decreasing, this is reflected in the fertility rates that were in a continuous decreasing pattern. The median age is almost the same, with a slight increase. The population density (P/km2) was also increasing, but not rapidly. As for the urban population, it was constantly increasing, this indicates the large number of urbanization and migration from the countryside to the cities, Table (2) & Figures (1&2).
Table 2 World Population, Yearly Change, Median Age, Fertility Rate, Density Urban Population (1955 - 2020) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Population | Yearly change % | Yearly change | Median Age | Fertility Rate | Density (P/km2) | Urban Pop. % | Urban Population |
1955 | 2,77,30,19,936 | 1.80% | 4,73,17,757 | 23 | 4.97 | 19 | N.A. | N.A. |
1960 | 3,03,49,49,748 | 1.82% | 5,23,85,962 | 23 | 4.9 | 20 | 33.70% | 1,02,38,45,517 |
1965 | 3,33,95,83,597 | 1.93% | 6,09,26,770 | 22 | 5.02 | 22 | N.A. | N.A. |
1970 | 3,70,04,37,046 | 2.07% | 7,21,70,690 | 22 | 4.93 | 25 | 36.60% | 1,35,42,15,496 |
1975 | 4,07,94,80,606 | 1.97% | 7,58,08,712 | 22 | 4.47 | 27 | 37.70% | 1,53,86,24,994 |
1980 | 4,45,80,03,514 | 1.79% | 7,57,04,582 | 23 | 3.86 | 30 | 39.30% | 1,75,42,01,029 |
1985 | 4,87,09,21,740 | 1.79% | 8,25,83,645 | 23 | 3.59 | 33 | 41.20% | 2,00,79,39,063 |
1990 | 5,32,72,31,061 | 1.81% | 9,12,61,864 | 24 | 3.44 | 36 | 43.00% | 2,29,02,28,096 |
1995 | 5,74,42,12,979 | 1.52% | 8,33,96,384 | 25 | 3.01 | 39 | 44.80% | 2,57,55,05,235 |
2000 | 6,14,34,93,823 | 1.35% | 7,98,56,169 | 26 | 2.78 | 41 | 46.70% | 2,86,83,07,513 |
2005 | 6,54,19,07,027 | 1.26% | 7,96,82,641 | 27 | 2.65 | 44 | 49.20% | 3,21,59,05,863 |
2010 | 6,95,68,23,603 | 1.24% | 8,29,83,315 | 28 | 2.58 | 47 | 51.70% | 3,59,48,68,146 |
2015 | 7,37,97,97,139 | 1.19% | 8,45,94,707 | 30 | 2.52 | 50 | 54.00% | 3,98,14,97,663 |
2020 | 7,79,47,98,739 | 1.05% | 8,13,30,639 | 30.9 | 2.47 | 52 | 56.20% | 4,37,89,93,944 |
Figure (3) below shows the secular trend (1955-2020) of global yearly change which is still positive trend as the equation shows that, where (β = 2416578) represent the annual yearly increase (Raftery, 2012).
Table 3 Forecasting World Population, Yearly Change, Median Age, Fertility Rate, Density Urban Population (2020 - 2050) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Population | Yearly change % | Yearly change | Median Age | Fertility Rate | Density (P/km2) | Urban Pop. % | Urban Population |
2020 | 7,79,47,98,739 | 1.10% | 8,30,00,320 | 31 | 2.47 | 52 | 56.20% | 4,37,89,93,944 |
2025 | 8,18,44,37,460 | 0.98% | 7,79,27,744 | 32 | 2.54 | 55 | 58.30% | 4,77,46,46,303 |
2030 | 8,54,84,87,400 | 0.87% | 7,28,09,988 | 33 | 2.62 | 57 | 60.40% | 5,16,72,57,546 |
2035 | 8,88,75,24,213 | 0.78% | 6,78,07,363 | 34 | 2.7 | 60 | 62.50% | 5,55,58,33,477 |
2040 | 9,19,88,47,240 | 0.69% | 6,22,64,605 | 35 | 2.77 | 62 | 64.60% | 5,93,82,49,026 |
2045 | 9,48,18,03,274 | 0.61% | 5,65,91,207 | 35 | 2.85 | 64 | 66.60% | 6,31,25,44,819 |
2050 | 9,73,50,33,990 | 0.53% | 5,06,46,143 | 36 | 2.95 | 65 | 68.60% | 6,67,97,56,162 |
United Nations predicted that the world population will continue to rise for the period from (2020) to (2050) to reach (9,735,033,990) person, but with decreasing annual rates of change with an increase median age as average up to (34) years with a slight increase in the fertility rate and population density and a clear rise in urbanization, table (3). The secular trend for the predicted period (2020 – 2050) is decreasing pattern in yearly change as shown in figure (4) where (β = –536717178).
Table 4 Global Population By Region |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region | Population (2020) | Yearly Change % | Density | Land Area | Fertility Rate | Med. Age | World share |
Asia | 4641054775 | 0.86 | 150 | 3,10,33,131 | 2.2 | 32 | 59.50% |
Africa | 1340598147 | 2.49 | 45 | 2,96,48,481 | 4.4 | 20 | 17.20% |
Europe | 747636026 | 0.06 | 34 | 2,21,34,900 | 1.6 | 43 | 9.60% |
Latin America and the Caribbean | 653962331 | 0.9 | 32 | 2,01,39,378 | 2 | 31 | 8.40% |
Northern America | 368869647 | 0.62 | 20 | 1,86,51,660 | 1.8 | 39 | 4.70% |
Oceania | 42677813 | 1.31 | 5 | 84,86,460 | 2.4 | 33 | 0.50% |
Asia ranked the highest population with highest density, land area, and world share, while less percentage yearly change because of its policy in childbearing (Wi´sniowski, 2015), the lowest in yearly change is Europe, table (4), figure (5), gives more details for the same
THE MODEL
For the technique of predicting population sizes, we will use Malthus’s model, a mathematical model of population growth as follows (Singh, 2015);
(δ) represents the population growth rate and it reflects a strong impact on how fast the population will grow.
: Indicate the model population increases to infinity as time goes to infinity. Then [P(t0)]
Represent the population size when (t = t0).
From equation (1);
Integrating both sides;
Where (C) is constant for some fixed ().
Equation (3) is the resolution of equation (1), it indicates an exponential function of e, and the population size grows exponentially as time (Bacaër, 2011).
For the applicability of the above formulas, we use the data shown in table (5), which express the population for the years (1990, 2000, 2010, 2020) for the global population and other six regions in addition to the population of the three levels of income and development. The results of applying table (5) to the above equations can be shown in table (6) below.
Table 5 Population by Regions Through Census Data (Million), (1990 – 2019). |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Region | 1990 | 2000 | 2010 | 2019 |
World | 5320.817 | 6127.7 | 6916.183 | 7713.468 |
More developed countries | 1148.278 | 1193.355 | 1240.935 | 1270.63 |
Less developed countries | 4172.538 | 4934.346 | 5675.249 | 6442.838 |
Least developed countries | 509.354 | 663.251 | 838.807 | 1033.389 |
High-income countries | 1154.191 | 1189.888 | 1226.688 | 1258.043 |
Middle-income countries | 4394.719 | 4993.999 | 5674.999 | 5696.667 |
Low-income countries | 400.877 | 494.91 | 611.55 | 755.85 |
Africa | 613.385 | 808.304 | 1031.081 | 1308.064 |
Asia | 3213.123 | 3717.372 | 4165.44 | 4601.371 |
Europe | 725.255 | 729.105 | 740.308 | 747.183 |
Latin America | 445.203 | 526.278 | 596.191 | 648.121 |
North America | 282.286 | 315.417 | 346.501 | 366.601 |
Oceania | 26.969 | 31.224 | 36.659 | 42.128 |
Table 6 Prediction Population by Regions for the Census Years (Million), (2010 & 2019). |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Region | 2010 | 2019 | |
World | 7054.226 | 8009.488 | |
More developed countries | 1241.429 | 1285.777 | |
Less developed countries | 5838.795 | 6791.858 | |
Least developed countries | 863.629 | 1095.256 | |
High-income countries | 1225.562 | 1259.103 | |
Middle-income countries | 5676.890 | 6370.026 | |
Low-income countries | 610.119 | 737.049 | |
Africa | 1065.234 | 1365.659 | |
Asia | 4302.703 | 4906.904 | |
Europe | 732.544 | 735.848 | |
Latin America | 621.745 | 722.581 | |
North America | 374.249 | 389.483 | |
Oceania | 36.114 | 41.186 |
The applicability of the equations shows that the predicted population is slightly greater than the real population for all heads comes in table (6).
The Impact of Covid – 19 on the Growth Rate
The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which began in late 2019, forced the entire world to confront one of the most difficult challenges in contemporary history, as it caused the infected of millions and the death of others, but it would be a grave mistake to describe this challenge as a health crisis only, it is a large-scale humanitarian crisis that leads to the misery and suffering of all mankind and pushes its social and economic well-being to the brink of collapse (David, 2014). It has had various economic, social and political repercussions as it paralyzed all sectors of society in all countries of the world, countries are still suffering and will continue to suffer from its effects.
In order to contain the increasing threats emanating from its spread, everyone around the world has been keen to reduce the transmission of infection and reduce the death toll. Think of others, especially the most vulnerable, and act to protect them. Corona virus knows no borders, it has severely affected the lives and livelihoods of all people, from all social and economic backgrounds (Deshotel, 2013). This is a regional emergency that calls for an emergency regional response. A response that aims not to save countries, industries or financial institutions in the region, but rather to save thousands of lives. Any rescue initiative to eradicate this epidemic must revolve around the well-being of the people and the solidarity of the pillars of society, it should enable governments to resume work in order to establish a safe, just and prosperous world that does not neglect anyone.
As usual Covid-19 by the numbers of deaths especially affected on the growth of population depending on the total death for each region which differ from region to another, we would like to analyze some data regarding the update topic, we collected a data from the U N and its organizations (up to middle of June 2021). Statistics indicate that the epidemic killed more than three million people in the world (Covid-19, 2021). In fact, the number is higher because some deaths occurred outside the quarantine areas and were not officially registered. However, these numbers began to decline as a result of containing the epidemic and adhering to sound health instructions, in addition to the use of effective vaccines, and that most developed countries have left the impact of this epidemic on their people (Fabiano, 2017).
The number of infected people in the world (mid-June 2021) reached (174339994) (Covid-19, 2021), the total deaths due to the epidemic (3752900) constituted a percentage (0.0215) of the total infected, and a (0.0005) of the total population. If we take the scale of the regions, we find that the lowest region was Oceania with the number of infected (113233) and deaths (1893), the percentage of deaths to the number of infected (0.0167), the proportion of deaths to the total population of Oceania are almost null (Shang, 2016). Asia and Africa were the lowest, despite the population density of these two regions, where the ratio of deaths to the number of infected in Africa was (4970000), while Asia was by (52613244). Europe occupied the largest percentage in the number of infected people, despite the high health culture and environment, but the ratio of deaths to the number of infected people was (0.2304), followed by North America, then Latin America. Table (7) shows the details (Hironmoy, 2018).
Table 7 Actual Population by Regions, Total Cases & Total Deaths (covid-19). |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region | Population (1) | Total cases (2) | Total deaths (3) | 03/1 | 03/1 |
World | 7 713 468000 | 174339994 | 3752900 | 0.0215 | 0.0005 |
Asia | 4641054775 | 52613244 | 715022 | 0.0136 | 0.0002 |
Africa | 1340598147 | 4970000 | 132947 | 0.0267 | 0.0001 |
Europe | 747636026 | 46940024 | 1080408 | 0.2304 | 0.0014 |
Latin America | 653962331 | 31500000 | 1200000 | 0.0381 | 0.0018 |
North America | 368869647 | 38783363 | 867663 | 0.0224 | 0.0024 |
Oceania | 42677813 | 113233 | 1893 | 0.0167 | 0.00004 |
The ten most populous countries in the world have fluctuated their infected and deaths in relation to the size of their population, the strange thing is that China is the most populous country in the world, and it is the country from which the epidemic originated, the number of infected is (91300) with death (4636) ranked (0.0508) from infected and it is near to zero from total population. Other countries converged in the ratios of deaths to the number of infected according to the size of the population of each country, but Mexico had the highest death rate (228872) to the number of infected, table (8) below. The analysis of Covid-19 data, which was referred to above, clearly indicates an impact on population growth in all regions of the world (Jes´us, 2021).
Table 8 Top Ten Countries, Total Cases & Total Deaths (Covid 19). |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region | Population (2020) (1) | Total cases (2) | Total deaths (3) | 03/2 | 03/1 |
China | 1439323776 | 91300 | 4636 | 0.0508 | 0 |
India | 1380004385 | 28996949 | 351344 | 0.0121 | 0.0003 |
United States | 331002651 | 34227237 | 612701 | 0.0179 | 0.0019 |
Indonesia | 273523615 | 1875619 | 52181 | 0.0278 | 0.0002 |
Pakistan | 220892340 | 936396 | 21429 | 0.0229 | 0.0001 |
Brazil | 212559417 | 16985812 | 424614 | 0.025 | 0.002 |
Nigeria | 206139589 | 166816 | 2117 | 0.0127 | 0 |
Bangladesh | 164689383 | 812960 | 12869 | 0.0158 | 0.0001 |
Russia | 145934462 | 5155453 | 124875 | 0.02422 | 0.0009 |
Mexico | 128932753 | 2435443 | 228872 | 0.094 | 0.0018 |
Death figures shown in tables and figures above, due to the epidemic certainly have a direct impact on growth rates, and this effect remains even when the epidemic ends.
Based on the previous analysis and discussion, we can conclude that the world will face major economic, social, and environmental problems as a result of population growth, especially in third world countries and low-income countries that do not have laws or legislation to control births, in addition to the lack of an appropriate healthy environment, thus growth will continue, but with decreasing pace in the developed countries and East Asia, and at a slower rate of decreasing in other countries. Malthus models have been applied to the world's population and regions, as most studies have applied these models to specific countries. The population was estimated, as it was proved that the estimate according to the Malthus model is slightly higher than the real data for global population and all regions. The epidemic of the century (Covid 19), which occupied the world as a whole, was studied and its data obtained from (WHO) publications was analyzed and that the epidemic is on the way to receding due to the vaccines that were produced despite the losses caused by this epidemic, whether material, human or infrastructure losses, in addition there is a direct effect on population growth.