International Journal of Entrepreneurship (Print ISSN: 1099-9264; Online ISSN: 1939-4675)

Research Article: 2024 Vol: 28 Issue: 4

Optimizing Enterprise Adaptability to Inflationary Situations : Modeling the Implementation of AI in e -Management

Mamadou MBAYE, Université Iba Der Thiam de Thiès

Ibrahima THIAM, Université Iba Der Thiam de Thiès

Citation Information: MBAYE, M., THIAM, I., (2024). Optimizing Enterprise Adaptability to Inflationary Situations : Modeling The Implementation of AI in E -Management. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 28(S4),1-11

Abstract

In an environment marked by rampant inflation, organizational adaptability takes on crucial importance in maintaining companies' competitiveness. This article aims to explore the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in internal e-management to optimize this adaptability in the face of this major economic challenge. Through an approach based on a robust theoretical model, we analyze the mechanisms for incorporating AI into internal management processes, aiming to improve decision-making, enhance responsiveness to market fluctuations, and foster organizational innovation. Special attention is paid to modeling this integration, identifying key variables and their interactions to ensure its effectiveness. The combined use of qualitative and quantitative analyses allows us to evaluate the results obtained, particularly in terms of organizational performance, operational agility, and the ability to adapt to economic variations. Our methodology includes a discussion of the model, offering relevant recommendations to enable efficient application of the principles of prospective, agile, and innovative management, taking into account AI in management practices. The results provide valuable insights for its successful integration into internal e-management within organizations. Finally, the implications arising from the study enrich the academic understanding of the synergies necessary for organizational adaptability in a volatile economic environment

Keywords

Inflation, Management, Modeling, Artificial Intelligence

JEL Classification

E31, D21, G11

Introduction

Managing a company is not an easy task because several internal and external variables challenge the cohesion and consistency of the strategies implemented to achieve customer satisfaction. To lead such a complex structure, more than a mechanical and rigid application of management techniques is required. Management, in a more holistic sense, will allow control over the company regardless of environmental turbulence and countercyclical forces (Göçer & Tansel, 2022). The manager has the delicate mission of quickly identifying variables that may impact their operational and strategic objectives to ensure the sustainability of their company.

Traditionally, the goals pursued by private entities have been well defined; the most accepted is certainly the creation of wealth, with profit being the main indicator (Kim & Lee, 2022). However, there is a conceptual shift and the generalization of new concepts focused on value-added since the advent of Michael Porter's value chain theory. This holistic approach encompasses not only the financial gains from activity but also all benefits and advantages, often grouped under the generic term "value". This inclusive vision requires proactive and agile market share management, taking into account the product life cycle and external variables such as inflation.

In this dynamic economic ecosystem, companies must constantly adapt their internal management strategies to maintain competitiveness. It is in this context that the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into internal e-management becomes crucial. This strategy, still emerging but promising, offers innovative tools and perspectives to optimize organizational adaptability in the face of rampant inflation. By providing advanced mechanisms for data collection, analysis, and utilization, AI helps companies anticipate market trends, make more informed decisions, and quickly adjust their strategies in response to rapid and unpredictable economic changes.

Thus, exploring this relationship between AI and internal management in the context of organizational adaptability provides a fertile ground for academic research and an exciting perspective for practitioners seeking to strengthen their company's resilience in a perpetually changing economic environment. Inflation is a complex and recurrent economic phenomenon that has significant consequences for the company and its environment. It is currently almost universal, affecting all sectors of the global economy. It is noteworthy that no continent is spared, as illustrated by the following data (Table 1/Table 2) regarding inflation levels for the year 2022.

Table 1 Inflation Rates for These Countries
Countries Inflation rates
India 6.23
United States 2.60
Brazil 5.57
Germany 1.80
China 1.50
Source : Mert (2022)
Table 2 Inflation Rates for these Countries
Countries Inflation rates
Nigeria 12.10
Egypt 7.20
Kenya 7.90
South Africa 4.50
Morocco 1.80
Source : Mert (2022)

It is important to note that these inflation rates are influenced by various macroeconomic factors such as economic growth, monetary and fiscal policies, fluctuations in commodity prices, among others. For the following African countries, we have the following indications for the same period:

Finally, in the European Union, the inflation rate (EU) in 2022 was approximately 1.50%. This is a weighted average of the rates of the various EU members, which vary considerably between countries and years, depending on specific macroeconomic factors within the union. To contain this inflation and manage its impacts on business performance, managers adopt several strategies. They must constantly challenge organizational and operational processes to maximize efficiency and explore new sources of consumables to limit its impact on production costs (Tchuindjo, 2021).

The aim of this article is to model the implementation of AI in companies to boost their resilience in an inflationary environment. The methodology adopted relies on an integrative approach. First, a comprehensive analysis of the literature is conducted to understand the challenges posed by the current economic environment and the limitations of traditional management. Then, an exploration of prospective, agile, and innovative management models is undertaken based on the work of Göçer & Tansel (2022) to highlight the importance of the company's flexibility and adaptability.

Finally, a discussion of the results obtained through modeling is conducted, accompanied by practical recommendations to help companies effectively implement the principles of prospective, agile, and innovative management, and the implementation of AI in their management practices. This methodology offers a comprehensive and rigorous approach to addressing the challenge of organizational adaptability in an inflationary context, highlighting the importance of AI in internal e-management. The article is composed of four parts: an introduction, a section on classical management, another on management adaptability, then modeling, and finally the conclusion and recommendations.

Rigidity of Classic Company Management

Inflation is a complex economic phenomenon that impacts the purchasing power of various economic agents. Due to its impact on production costs and companies' profit margins, it is crucial to rethink the internal management of organizations for better adaptability to the environment. In an inflationary context, managers must adopt different strategies that involve functional reorganization and the readjustment of operational processes to maximize productivity and reduce costs by exploring and appropriating new sources of raw materials. In such an environment, it is the role of internal management to take appropriate measures (Yalçin & Ünal, 2021) to enable the company to be resilient and limit the impact of inflation on profitability objectives.Internal management is defined as a set of processes, decisions, and practices that enable an organization to operate effectively. However, in a dynamic and changing environment, its rigidity makes the company ill-suited and incapable of facing growth challenges. Its inadequacy is due to a variety of factors, such as organizational inflexibility in operational processes, decision-making method, resistance to change, distrust of innovation, and poor understanding of market trends and the economic environment.

Indeed, one of the most notable consequences of the inadequacy of internal management is the rigidity of operational processes (Kiliç & Sengül, 2021), which make companies prisoners of obsolete work methods, preventing them from being competitive in a dynamic, competitive, and changing environment. In such an organization, corporate culture influences employees who show some reluctance to adopt new work methods or processes, making it difficult to implement significant improvements within the company. This rigidity hinders innovation and the adoption of new technologies to enhance productivity. Thus, the company, being too cautious, rejects the implementation of new work methods and does not take advantage of the potential benefits of innovation. The poor understanding of market trends and the economic environment makes internal management unsuitable in an inflationary environment, as companies, insensitive to market developments, become increasingly uncompetitive against an increasingly aggressive competition. To meet these challenges, they must adopt a flexible approach and be open to change. They must be willing to review their organizations and operational processes, adopt new technologies, and adapt to changes in demand. It is also necessary for managers to assess the financial risks associated with inflation and to implement cost-cutting techniques.

In an inflationary environment, companies face significant challenges in cost management, profitability, and business survival. In these difficult economic conditions where expenses are increasingly growing, classic company management proves to be rigid and unsuitable for performance challenges. Indeed, under the effect of inflation, raw materials, wages, and other expenses increase, while profitability decreases. The manager must be able to mitigate them without compromising the quality of products and services. In this task, classic management proves to be limited, as traditional methods of staff layoffs and marketing expenses negatively impact the quality of deliverables (Guo & Wang, 2021), compromise customer satisfaction, and damage the company's reputation; this penny-pinching approach is completely ineffective. In an inflationary environment, cash management is also a challenge for companies. Cash flows are disrupted due to price fluctuations and cost increases. Companies must be able to manage their cash effectively to avoid illiquidity. Classic company management could be limited in this task, as traditional cash management methods such as expense reduction negatively affect the company's ability to generate sufficient flows to cover solvency needs.

In such an environment, companies face increased cash tension risks related to price volatility and rising expenses. They must therefore be able to effectively address these risks to minimize their impacts on company profitability. In this context as well, we observe the limitations of management, as traditional risk management methods, such as insurance, diversification, or hedging (Adhikari & Agrawal, 2021), are not sufficient to protect against inflation. As a reminder, internal management is based on principles such as strategic planning, prioritization, centralization, and bureaucracy developed in the early twentieth century and which have been widely tested over the years. However, in an ever-changing economic environment, they are unsuitable for current profitability challenges and especially for flexibility.Firstly, prioritization, which is one of the fundamental principles of classic company management, leads to a loss of creativity and innovation.

Employees at the bottom of the ladder often hold little power and are not encouraged to propose new ideas or challenge decisions made by superiors. It is an organizational structure of a pyramidal type in which decisions are made at the top and mechanically transmitted downward (Hamza & Mir, 2021); this in turn leads to high costs and excessive bureaucracy. Decisions transmitted through different functional levels circulate difficultly, are interpreted differently, lose relevance, and result in operational dysfunction and non-quality costs for the company. Centralization, another fundamental principle of classic company management, implies a certain loss of flexibility.

Decisions made at the central level are often disconnected from operations and prevent the company from quickly adapting to changing demand. It also comes with heavy bureaucracy with strict rules and fixed procedures that weigh down efficiency and prevent employees from making quick and effective decisions. In conclusion, inflation has many impacts on organizations, but by rethinking internal management and working collaboratively with all stakeholders, companies can adapt and minimize its consequences on their growth. They must assess and anticipate its potential impacts, work with partners on flexible contracts, maintain transparent communication with customers, and collaborate with authorities to obtain tax incentives.

Prospective, Agile, and Innovative Management Against Inflation

Inflation is a general increase in the prices of goods and services over a given period. Generally, it negatively impacts businesses that must deal with rising costs while trying to maintain a reasonable level of profitability. To meet these challenges, they must rethink their internal management methods and adopt a more agile and innovative approach. Agile management has the advantage of focusing on flexibility, speed of execution, and the company's ability to adapt to changes. It relies on a flexible work style and simplified operational processes, allowing the organization to keep pace with environmental changes. This approach effectively helps to cope with rampant inflation.

In an ever-evolving economic context, companies must adopt efficient management techniques to maintain their competitiveness. The agile method, notably Scrum (Table 3), is increasingly used. It is an approach that focuses on flexibility, collaboration, and communication. It is particularly suitable for dynamic companies seeking to respond quickly to economic changes, such as inflation. It relies on teamwork, with well-defined tasks organized into sprints, which are intense work periods of a few weeks during which specific activities and performance objectives are focused on.

Table 3 Agile Method (Scrum)
Rôles Rituels Artefacts Valeurs Piliers
Product Owner Backlog Refinement Product Backlog Engagement Transparence
Équipe de réalisation -
autoorganisée
    Ouverture  
Sprint planning Sprint Backlog   Inspection
Scrum Master Sprint Definition of Done Focus Adaptation
  DailyScrum Increment Respect  
  Sprint Review BurndownChart Courage  
  Sprint retrospective      
Source : Sanaei & Mahdavi (2021)

Data collection is a key element of Scrum. Companies regularly need economic data to understand the impact of inflation on their activities. This includes information on production costs, inflation rates, consumption trends, and economic forecasts; the collected data is used to plan sprints so that the Scrum team can focus on the most important tasks aimed at countering inflation. Through meticulous planning, it regularly organizes meetings to review progress and adjust priorities.

Specific sprints (Sharma & Bhatnagar, 2021) can be organized for cost reduction or the implementation of new marketing strategies to adapt to the dynamics of the environment. This requires constant, cross-functional, open, and transparent communication among developers to discuss any issues. This collaboration helps the company to react in time; it is indeed an essential pillar of strategic monitoring and economic intelligence.

Although Scrum is effective in combating inflation, it has significant limitations. Firstly, it is best suited for short-term projects; large companies with multiple strategic business areas must regularly plan sectoral sprints to counter inflation. Furthermore, it is difficult to implement in companies with a pyramidal management style and an internal organization that lacks flexibility see figure 1.

Figure 1 The Spring

In a constantly evolving economic environment, it is necessary for businesses to adapt quickly to changes to remain competitive. Innovation is also a key aspect of management to mitigate inflation. Companies must be able to generate new ideas, products, and processes to address market challenges and environmental dynamics to strengthen their competitive position and increase market share. Innovation-focused management helps better understand trends and anticipate competition developments (Ntinda, Kinyua & Ng’ang’a, 2021). Indeed, it enables companies to collect and analyze data on PESTEL variables to adopt more appropriate policies and anticipate the impacts of inflation.

It is also important to note that companies must be more open and adopt more collaborative approaches with their various partners. They must cooperate with subcontractors, service providers, and government authorities to find concerted solutions aimed at stabilizing and even reducing costs. Faced with inflation, they would benefit from adopting a flexible, agile, and innovative approach that requires reflection on internal management processes, the implementation of flexible working methods, the implementation of an innovative strategy, and frank collaboration with other economic actors. By embracing such approaches, companies adapt more easily to the challenges of inflation and strengthen their financial stability and competitive position.

This flexible management relies on adaptability and agility. These key principles should initially concern the organizational structure because, instead of a rigid hierarchy and strict centralization, the company must have flexible structures including autonomous teams allowing decision-making at the local (operational or tactical) rather than strategic level. Thus, it reacts quickly to economic changes related to evolving demand and customer requirements.

Workforce flexibility is another component. It can be translated into flexible working hours, more independent employees, or sometimes, depending on the context, performance contracts that allow the company to quickly adapt to changing needs and costs. This can be particularly useful for companies facing economic pressures (Salarzadeh & Alizadeh, 2020) such as inflation and competitive pressure. Indeed, if costs increase, reducing staff or adjusting working hours leads to lower expenses.

Flexibility also concerns the process and allows the company better adaptability of its production tool and could include process automation and better use of technology. For example, if production costs increase due to inflation, processes can be automated to act as cost killers. However, flexible management also has limitations to consider, the most important of which is the risk of loss of control of the steering process by managers. Hence the need for realistic but also prospective and proactive management to remain competitive by anticipating economic changes, planning consequences, and remaining in control of the company.

To survive, companies must identify the variables that could affect their activities, including data on inflation, production costs, exchange rates, and consumption trends. This approach leads to the identification of new niches to reduce risks related to cost volatility. It facilitates the implementation of product diversification strategies to avoid excessive charges (Kiliç & Sengül, 2021). These strategies enable companies to cope with unforeseen economic situations of great magnitude.

However, it should be noted that it is difficult for companies to regularly collect and analyze economic data. This is particularly true for SMEs/SMBs that lack the necessary resources to allocate specifically to this task. Moreover, even if this economic monitoring helps companies anticipate inflation, it is difficult to predict exactly when it will occur and to what extent it will affect the company. Therefore, the strategies adopted show limitations that must always be taken into account.

Modeling the Implementation of AI

Presentation of the Model :

This is a theoretical model intended for internal management through artificial intelligence, with a focus on the company's adaptability to inflation :

Identification of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) related to inflation :

- Define and select relevant KPIs that are likely to be impacted by inflation, such as production costs, profit margins, selling prices, etc.

Data Collection and Inflation Forecasting :

- Implement automated systems to collect and aggregate relevant economic data, including inflation indices, market data, price trends, etc.

- Use predictive analytics techniques to anticipate future inflation fluctuations and assess their potential impact on the company's operations.

Scenario Modeling and Strategic Planning :

- Scenarioize different inflation projections to assess financial and operational implications for the company;

- Develop flexible strategic plans that incorporate specific adaptation measures based on the various inflation scenarios envisaged.

Optimization of Operational Processes:

- Deploy optimization solutions to dynamically adjust the company's internal processes, such as inventory management, product pricing, procurement decisions, etc., in response to inflation variations ;

- Automate recurring tasks and standardize processes to improve operational efficiency and reduce costs.

AI-assisted Decision Making:

- Use AI systems to analyze real-time data and provide intelligent recommendations for decision-making, considering financial goals, budget constraints, and inflation-related risks;

- Integrate machine learning algorithms to enhance the accuracy of forecasts and recommendations over time, adapting to changes in the economic environment.

Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation :

- Establish mechanisms for continuous monitoring of the company's financial and operational performance, focusing on inflation-related indicators;

- Conduct regular assessments to measure the effectiveness of inflation adaptation strategies and adjust approaches accordingly.

Training and Skills Development:

- Train employees in key concepts related to inflation, the use of data analysis tools, and the interpretation of recommendations provided by AI systems;

- Encourage the development of problem-solving and decision-making skills in a complex and changing economic environment.

By applying this theoretical model, companies enhance their ability to anticipate and react proactively to the challenges posed by inflation, while improving their agility and competitiveness in the market.

Model Formulation

FIA=∑ ni=1(Pi×Wi)

Where,

• FIA represents the company's adaptability factor to inflation through artificial intelligence.

• Pi represents the contribution of each component of the model (identification of inflation-related KPIs, data collection, scenario modeling, etc.).

• Wi represents the weight assigned to each component based on its relative importance in the overall model

The weights Wi are determined by a multicriteria analysis taking into account factors such as potential impact on company performance, implementation complexity, and resource availability.

This formula allows quantifying the overall effectiveness of the theoretical model by aggregating the individual contributions of its components, facilitating the evaluation and comparison of different internal management approaches by AI in the context of adaptability to inflation.

Model Specifications:

Suppose a consumer goods manufacturing company uses the theoretical model to manage its inflation impact. Let's consider estimating the contributions of each component of the model to its overall adaptability factor, using a scale of 1 to 10 to represent their relative importance, and assuming equal weight assigned to each component :

• Identification of inflation-related key performance indicators (KPIs) : P1=8

• Data collection and inflation forecasting : P2=7

• Scenario modeling and strategic planning : P3=9

• Optimization of operational processes: P4=8

• AI-assisted decision-making: P5=9

• Continuous monitoring and evaluation : P6=8

• Training and skill development: P7=7

Since we assumed equal weights for each component, each Wi will be (1/7).

Using the formula of the theoretical model, we can calculate the company's overall adaptability factor (FIA) to inflation :

FIA= (1/7) × (8+7+9+8+9+8+7)

FIA= (1/7) ×56

FIA ≈ 8

Thus, in this example, the company's overall adaptability factor to inflation through the use of the theoretical internal management model by AI is evaluated at around 8 on a scale of 1 to 10. This suggests that the company is well positioned to address the challenges of inflation by implementing this model.

Discussion and Recommendations

The proposed model offers a comprehensive approach to improve the company's adaptability to inflation using advanced AI techniques. It integrates essential components such as identification of inflation-related KPIs, data collection and analysis, scenario modeling, AI-assisted decision-making, and continuous monitoring.

Recommendations

To optimize the model, it is important to focus on the following points:

• Validation and Calibration: It is recommended to validate the model using real data and to calibrate it regularly to ensure its accuracy and reliability.

• Flexibility and Agility: The model should be designed to be flexible and agile, capable of quickly adapting to economic and political changes.

• Training and Awareness: Investing in employee training and awareness is important to maximize the effective use of the model and ensure successful adoption within the company's internal management.

• Risk Management : It is necessary to implement risk management mechanisms to identify and mitigate potential risks associated with the use of AI in decision-making processes.

• Continuous Evaluation : Continuous evaluation of the model's performance should be planned to identify areas for improvement and make necessary adjustments.

• Strengthening Monitoring and Evaluation : Robust monitoring systems should be implemented to continuously assess the model's performance and identify areas for improvement.

• Interdisciplinary Collaboration : Encouraging collaboration between AI experts, economists, and policymakers is essential to ensure a holistic understanding of economic challenges and an appropriate response.

The model offers a promising approach to address contemporary economic challenges. By integrating advanced data analysis, predictive modeling, and AI techniques, it enables companies to anticipate inflation fluctuations and make informed decisions to maintain their competitiveness.

Conclusion

Inflation is an economic phenomenon that can have significant consequences for businesses. It leads to cost increases, a decrease in demand for products and services, and a decline in consumer and investor confidence. To adapt, it is important for organizations to rethink their internal management by adopting a flexible and proactive approach. Companies must assess the potential impacts of inflation on their business model and strategy to determine measures to minimize costs and maximize profitability. To do so, employees need to be trained to manage changes, negotiate more flexible contracts, and reduce consumables and capital costs.

Customers are also a key element in adapting to inflation ; maintaining open communication with them and understanding their needs and expectations is important to avoid non-quality costs. To optimize cash flow, companies must also engage with government authorities to obtain incentives and various tax benefits to mitigate the impacts of inflation. To rethink internal management to foster better adaptability of the company to inflation, leaders must consider several aspects including the following:

• Adopting a culture of adaptability within the company by encouraging employees to be open to change and react quickly to new situations. Managers should encourage innovation and calculated risk-taking.

• Establishing strategic monitoring to continuously monitor economic developments and market trends, in order to make informed decisions and adapt quickly to changes.

• Encouraging collaboration between different teams and departments to facilitate problem-solving and the implementation of concerted solutions.

• Adopting agile management methods such as Scrum to help the company respond quickly to economic changes through an iterative and collaborative approach.

• Regularly revising the company's strategy to ensure it is aligned with economic trends and adapted to new challenges.

In a context of rampant inflation, where companies are facing unprecedented challenges, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into internal e-management offers a promising strategic path to resilience and prosperity. The results of the model clearly demonstrate that this approach can be a crucial lever to strengthen organizational adaptability in the face of increasing economic pressures. AI brings tangible benefits by enabling more informed and rapid decision-making through advanced analysis of data and market trends. Indeed, the model explicates how AI can be synergistically integrated into internal management processes, thereby improving responsiveness to sudden changes and fostering organizational innovation.

To succeed in this transformation, companies must adopt a holistic approach. They must first invest in technological infrastructure and in developing the necessary skills to fully exploit the potential of AI. Additionally, a culture of adaptability and innovation must be encouraged, with strong leadership focused on strategic alignment and stakeholder engagement. The implementation of AI in e-management also requires close collaboration between different teams and departments, as well as transparent, cross-functional, and open communication with customers and business partners. This will enable a better understanding of market needs and rapid adaptation to economic developments.

Finally, ongoing employee training is essential to ensure effective use of AI and a thorough understanding of its economic implications. Companies must invest in empowering their staff to ensure a successful transition to AI-powered e-management. The implementation of AI represents a major strategic opportunity for organizations to thrive in an ever-changing economic environment. By following the recommendations of the model and adopting a proactive and collaborative approach, companies strengthen their resilience and flexibility, thus ensuring their growth and sustainability.

References

Abdul Nifa, F. A. (2013). Development of a framework for partnering through aligning organizational cultures in the Malaysian construction industry (Doctoral dissertation).

Google Scholar

Abedifar, V., Mirjalili, S. M., & Eshghi, M. (2015). A two-objective optimization scheme for high-OSNR and low-power-consuming all-optical networks. Optical Fiber Technology, 21, 115-121.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Acar, A. Z., & Acar, P. (2014). Organizational culture types and their effects on organizational performance in Turkish hospitals. EMAJ: Emerging Markets Journal, 3(3), 18-31.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Adkins, B., & Caldwell, D. (2004). Firm or subgroup culture: where does fitting in matter most?. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(8), 969-978.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Ahmady, G. A., Nikooravesh, A., & Mehrpour, M. (2016). Effect of organizational culture on knowledge management based on Denison model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 387-395.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Aktaş, E., Çiçek, I., & Kıyak, M. (2011). The effect of organizational culture on organizational efficiency: The moderating role of organizational environment and CEO values. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1560-1573.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Alderfer, C. P., & Smith, K. K. (1982). Studying intergroup relations embedded in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35-65.

Google Scholar

Aldhuwaihi, A., Shee, H. K., & Stanton, P. (2012). Organisational culture and the job satisfaction-turnover intention link: A case study of the Saudi Arabian banking sector. World, 2(3), 127-41.

Google Scholar

Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2015). Integrating the organizational change literature: a model for successful change. Journal of organizational change management, 28(2), 234-262.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Ali, A. J. (1995). Cultural discontinuity and Arab management thought. International Studies of Management & Organization, 25(3), 7-30.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Al-Meer, A. R. A. (1989). Organizational commitment: A comparison of Westerners, Asians, and Saudis. International Studies of Management & Organization, 19(2), 74-84.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Al‐Shaikh, F. N. (2003). The practical reality theory and business ethics in non‐Western context: evidence from Jordan. Journal of Management Development, 22(8), 679-693.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Alvesson, M., & Berg, P. O. (2011). Corporate culture and organizational symbolism: An overview.

Google Scholar

Armstrong, M. (2006). A handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers.

Google Scholar

Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C. P., & Peterson, M. F. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Sage.

Google Scholar

At-Twaijri, M. I., & Al-Muhaiza, I. A. (1996). Hofstede's cultural dimensions in the GCC countries: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 9(2), 121-131.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2010). Where to go from here: Integration and future research on work engagement. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 181-196.

Google Scholar

Balan, S., & Vreja, L. O. (2013, November). The Trompenaars’ seven-dimension cultural model and cultural orientations of Romanian students in management. In Proceedings of the 7th International Management Conference" New Management for the New Economy", November 7th-8th, Bucharest, Romania.

Google Scholar

Benjamin, D. J., Brown, S. A., & Shapiro, J. M. (2013). Who is ‘behavioral’? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(6), 1231-1255.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Bennis, W. G. (1969). The temporary society. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 3(4), 223-242.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Brown, M. F. (1998). Can culture be copyrighted?. Current anthropology, 39(2), 193-222.

Google Scholar

Cacciattolo, K. (2014). Understanding organisational cultures. European scientific journal.

Google Scholar

Chalofsky, N. (2003). An emerging construct for meaningful work. Human Resource Development International, 6(1), 69-83.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Colyer, S. (2000). Organizational culture in selected Western Australian sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 14(4), 321-341.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Cooke, R. A., & Rousseau, D. M. (1988). Behavioral Norms and Expectations. Group &  Organization Studies, 13(3), 245–273.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Crozier, M. (1964). Pouvoir et organisation. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 5(1), 52-64.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Dadfar, H. (1984). Organization as a Mirror for Reflection of National Culture: A study of organizational characteristics in Islamic nations.

Google Scholar

Dadfar, H. (1987). Organizational responses to a revolutionary environment: The case of Iran. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 3(3-4), 213-232.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

de Mello e Souza Wildermuth, C., & Pauken, P. D. (2008). A perfect match: decoding employee engagement–Part I: Engaging cultures and leaders. Industrial and commercial training, 40(3), 122-128.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1983). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life: Addison-Wesley, 1982. ISBN: 0-201-10277-3. $14.95. Business Horizons, 26(2), 82-85.

Google Scholar

Denison, D. (2011). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness, Denison consulting.

Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of management review, 21(3), 619-654.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Denison, D. R., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1991). Organizational culture and organizational development: A competing values approach. Research in organizational change and development, 5(1), 1-21.

Google Scholar

Denison, D., Nieminen, L., & Kotrba, L. (2014). Diagnosing organizational cultures: A conceptual and empirical review of culture effectiveness surveys. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(1), 145-161.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Detert, J. R., Schroeder, R. G., & Mauriel, J. J. (2000). A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of management Review, 25(4), 850-863.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Dimitrov, K. (2013). Edgar Schein’s model of organizational culture levels as a hologram. Икономически изследвания, (4), 3-36.

Google Scholar

Ebadollah, A. (2011). Organizational culture and productivity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 772-776.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Ehrhart, M. G., Schneider, B., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture: An introduction to theory, research, and practice. Routledge.

Google Scholar

Faris, E., & Parsons, T. (1953). The Social System. American Sociological Review, 18(1), 103. 

Ford, D. P., & Chan, Y. E. (2003). Knowledge sharing in a multi-cultural setting: a case study. Knowledge management research & practice, 1(1), 11-27.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Gajendran, T., Brewer, G., Dainty, A. R., & Runeson, G. (2012). A conceptual approach to studying the organisational culture of construction projects. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, The, 12(2), 1-26.

Google Scholar

Giffords, E. D., & Dina, R. P. (2003). Changing organizational cultures: The challenge in forging successful mergers. Administration in Social Work, 27(1), 69-81.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2002). The cross‐level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(6), 767-794.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Gump, S. E. (2009). Book Review: Gary P. Ferraro, The Cultural Dimension of International Business, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006. 216 pp. ISBN 978—0-13—192767—4. Price $53.33. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9(3), 382-385.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Halbesleben, J. R. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 8(1), 102-117.

Google Scholar

Hall, E. T. (1960). The silent language in overseas business. (No Title).

Google Scholar

Handy, C. B. (1976). So you want to change your organisation? Then first identify its culture. Management education and development, 7(2), 67-84.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Hani Brdesee, Corbitt, B., Siddhi Pittayachawan, & Wafaa Alsaggaf. (2012). Organisational culture and adoption of electronic commerce: A study of the Saudi Arabian tourism market. In 2012 7th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (pp. 857-862). IEEE.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Harper, R. A., Subanthore, A., & Gritzner, C. F. (2007). Saudi Arabia. In Google Books.

Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1996). The affective implications of perceived congruence with culture dimensions during organizational transformation. Journal of management, 22(4), 527-547.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Harrison, R. and Stokes, H. (1992) . Diagnosing Organizational Culture Instrument. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons.

Hartnell, C. A., Ou, A. Y., & Kinicki, A. (2011). Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: a meta-analytic investigation of the competing values framework's theoretical suppositions. Journal of applied psychology, 96(4), 677.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). sage.

Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications.

Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2017). Country Comparison-Hofstede Insights. Hofstede Insights.

Google Scholar

Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Long-versus short-term orientation: new perspectives. Asia Pacific business review, 16(4), 493-504.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Vol. 2). New York: Mcgraw-hill

Google Scholar

Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative science quarterly, 286-316.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model. Journal of business research, 67(8), 1609-1621.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Johnson, G. (2015). Cultural Web. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 1-2.

Google Scholar

Johnson, M. K. (1988). Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(4), 390.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Jung, T., Scott, T., Davies, H. T., Bower, P., Whalley, D., McNally, R., & Mannion, R. (2009). Instruments for exploring organizational culture: A review of the literature. Public administration review, 69(6), 1087-1096.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Kalliny, M., & Gentry, L. (2007). Cultural values reflected in Arab and American television advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 29(1), 15-32.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Kaouache, R. (2016). Analysis of organizational cultures. 45-56.

Kavoossi, M. (2000). The globalization of business and the Middle East: Opportunities and constraints. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Google Scholar

Khan, M. A., & Afzal, H. (2011). High level of education builds up strong relationship between organizational culture and organization performance in Pakistan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(07), 1387-1400.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Khan, S. (2016). Influence of Organizational Culture on Teacher's Work Engagement: An Empirical Study. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4).

Google Scholar

Kokt, D., & Van der Merwe, C. A. (2009). Using the competing values framework (CVF) to investigate organisational culture in a major private security company. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 12(3), 343-352.

Google Scholar

Kong, S. H. (2003). A portrait of Chinese enterprise through the lens of organizational culture. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 8(1), 83-102.

Google Scholar

Kotrba, L. M., Gillespie, M. A., Schmidt, A. M., Smerek, R. E., Ritchie, S. A., & Denison, D. R. (2012). Do consistent corporate cultures have better business performance? Exploring the interaction effects. Human relations, 65(2), 241-262.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Kotter, J. P. (1995). Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard business review, 73(2), 59-67.

Google Scholar

Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, Á. (2007). Comportamiento organizacional. Nova York, NY: McGraw Hill Irwin, 9.

Krog, A. K. (2014). The relationship between organizational culture and work engagement: A multilevel investigation (Master's thesis).

Google Scholar

Levinson, E. (2007). Developing high employee engagement makes good business sense. Interaction Associates.

Google Scholar

Liu, A. M., Shuibo, Z., & Meiyung, L. (2006). A framework for assessing organisational culture of Chinese construction enterprises. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(4), 327-342.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Luthans, Fred, T. & F. (2008). Organizational behavior. 11th ed. Boston : McGraw Hill/Irwin, c2008.

Maraña, M. (2010). Cultura y Desarrollo. Evolución y perspectivas. Unesco.

Google Scholar

Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Martin, J. (2001). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Sage publications.

Google Scholar

Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European journal of innovation management, 6(1), 64-74.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Martins, E., & Martins, N. (2002). An organisational culture model to promote creativity and innovation. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(4), 58-65.

Google Scholar

Martins, N., & Coetzee, M. (2011). Staff perceptions of organisational values in a large South African manufacturing company: Exploring socio-demographic differences. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(1), 01-11.

Google Scholar

Maslowski, R. (2006). A review of inventories for diagnosing school culture. Journal of educational administration, 44(1), 6-35.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2011). The evolution of Hofstede's doctrine. Cross cultural management: An international journal, 18(1), 10-20.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Morente, F., Ferràs, X., & Zizlavsky, O. (2018). Modelos culturais de inovação: revisão e proposta de seguintes passos. Revista Universidad y Empresa, 20(34), 53-81.

Google Scholar

Moshashai, D., Leber, A. M., & Savage, J. D. (2020). Saudi Arabia plans for its economic future: Vision 2030, the National Transformation Plan and Saudi fiscal reform. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 47(3), 381-401.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

O'Reilly III, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of management journal, 34(3), 487-516.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Obeng-Darko, D. (2010). Cross Cultural Business Communication: A case of Lower Silesia Chamber of Commerce, Wroclaw, Poland.

Google Scholar

Omotola, A. O., & Oladipupo, A. O. (2011). Concepts and measurement of culture in organisations. Journal of Communication and Culture, 1(1/2), 64-86.

Google Scholar

Chatman, J. A., & Spataro, S. E. (2005). Using self-categorization theory to understand relational demography–based variations in people's responsiveness to organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 321-331.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Zohar, D., & Hofmann, D. A. (2012). Organizational culture and climate.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A. J., & Muhammad, R. S. (2013). Organizational culture and climate. John  Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Parumasur, S. B. (2012). The effect of organisational context on organisational development (OD) interventions. SA journal of industrial psychology, 38(1), 1-12.

Google Scholar

Payne, D. (2000). Reporting errors. Cheesed off with the blame culture. Nursing times, 96(25), 10-11.

Google Scholar

Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative science quarterly, 24(4), 570-581.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Quinn, R. E., & McGrath, M. R. (1985). The transformation of organizational cultures: A competing values perspective.

Google Scholar

Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public productivity review, 122-140.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Quinn, R. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1991). The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on quality of life. Emerald.

Google Scholar

Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of management journal, 49(3), 433-458.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Roger Harrison, H. S. (1993), Diagnosing organizational culture, in Diagnosing organizational  culture. Pfeiffer & Co. - Business & Economics, 32.

Sackmann, S. A. (2011). Culture and performance. The handbook of organizational culture and climate, 2, 188-224.

Google Scholar

Saks, A. M. (2017). Translating employee engagement research into practice. Organizational Dynamics, 2(46), 76-86.

Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.

Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. (1986). What you need to know about organizational culture. Training & Development Journal.

Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture (Vol. 45, No. 2, p. 109). American Psychological Association.

Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. (1992). How can organizations learn faster?: the problem of entering the Green Room.

Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. (1996). Culture: The missing concept in organization studies. Administrative science quarterly, 229-240.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Schein, E. H. (2004) Organizational Culture and Leadership. Leadership, 7, 437. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. In Google Books. John Wiley &  Sons.

Schein, V. E. (1985). Organizational realities: The politics of change. Training & Development Journal.

Google Scholar

Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual review of psychology, 64, 361-388.

Google Scholar

Schraeder, M., Tears, R. S., & Jordan, M. H. (2005). Organizational culture in public sector organizations: Promoting change through training and leading by example. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(6), 492-502.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Smircich, L. (2017). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. The Anthropology of Organisations, 255-274.

Google Scholar

Oatey, H. S. (2012). What is culture? A compilation of quotations. Global PAD Core Concepts, 1-21.

Google Scholar

Stanton, J. M. (2021). Evaluating equivalence and confirming the null in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 24(3), 491-512.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Taştan, S. B., & Türker, M. V. (2014). A study of the relationship between organizational culture and job involvement: the moderating role of psychological conditions of meaningfulness and safety. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 943-947.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Thompson, M. C. (2017). ‘Saudi vision 2030’: A viable response to youth aspirations and concerns?. Asian Affairs, 48(2), 205-221.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The cultures of work organizations. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Google Scholar

Xenikou, A., & Furnham, A. (1996). A correlational and factor analytic study of four questionnaire measures of organizational culture. Human relations, 49(3), 349-371.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Yu, T., & Wu, N. (2009). A review of study on the competing values framework. International journal of business and management, 4(7), 37-42.

Google Scholar

Zammuto, R. F., Gifford, B., & Goodman, E. A. (2000). Managerial ideologies, organization culture and the outcomes of innovation: A competing values perspective.

Google Scholar

Zedeck, S. E. (2011). APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization.

Google Scholar

Zion, S., Kozleski, E., & Fulton, M. L. (2005). Understanding culture. National Institute for Urban School Improvement.

Google Scholar

Received: 28-Mar-2024, Manuscript No. IJE-24-14818; Editor assigned: 01-Apr-2024, Pre QC No. IJE-24-14818 (PQ); Reviewed: 15-Apr-2024, QC No. IJE-24-14818; Revised: 20-Apr-2024, Manuscript No. IJE-24-14818 (R); Published: 26-Apr-2024

Get the App