Research Article: 2025 Vol: 29 Issue: 2S
Hanene Hammami, Tabuk University, Saudi Arabia
Citation Information: Hammami, H. (2025). Intercultural negotiation strategies: enhancing e-business performance through cultural intelligence and trust building. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 29(S2), 1-10.
Intercultural Negotiation, Cultural And Emotional Intelligence, E-Business Performance, Trust-Building, Qualitative Study.
In an increasingly interconnected global marketplace, effective negotiation across cultural boundaries is paramount for e-business success (Corbitt, 2003; Sarkar, 2010). Negotiation, in its simplest form, refers to the process in which two or more parties engage in discussions to reach a mutually beneficial agreement or resolve a conflict (HAMMAMI & DELLECH, 2022; Huang, 2023; Ramdani et al., 2024). However, it is not merely a transactional interaction but rather a complex interplay of interests (Reif & Brodbeck, 2022), emotions (Druckman & Olekalns, 2008; Olekalns & Druckman, 2014; Shapiro, 2002), communication styles (Drake, 1995; HAMMAMI & DELLECH, 2022; Miller, 2014) and cultural nuances (Brett, 2000; Ferdoush, 2023; Hofstede, 2011). As businesses expand internationally, understanding and navigating these cultural differences becomes crucial for achieving favorable outcomes (Chaudhary, 2024).
In the context of e-business, where interactions are often virtual and involve participants from diverse cultural backgrounds, the complexity of negotiations is heightened (Saidi, 2024). Cultural intelligence (CQ) the ability to recognize, understand, and adapt to cultural differences plays a critical role in shaping negotiation strategies and outcomes (Ali, 2023; Sharma, 2023). Professionals who are adept at leveraging cultural intelligence can tailor their approaches, leading to more favorable business results (Jamshed & Majeed, 2023).
This exploratory qualitative study aims to elucidate the relationship between intercultural negotiation strategies, cultural intelligence, and e-business performance. By focusing on the experiences of e-business professionals, this research highlights how tailored negotiation approaches can lead to improved business outcomes and provides a deeper understanding of how to interpret and respond to the strategies and behaviors of opposing negotiators from different cultural backgrounds. This insight equips professionals with the tools needed to anticipate and adapt to various negotiation tactics, fostering more productive and collaborative outcomes.
However, despite the increasing recognition of cultural intelligence in enhancing negotiation efficacy, there remains a significant gap in the literature concerning the practical application of CQ in real-world e-business contexts. Much of the existing research focuses on theoretical frameworks rather than empirical studies that examine how cultural intelligence translates into successful negotiation practices. Additionally, while the role of technology in facilitating intercultural negotiations is acknowledged, the specific impact of digital communication tools on negotiation outcomes across diverse cultural settings remains underexplored. Addressing these gaps is essential for developing a comprehensive understanding of how cultural intelligence can be effectively harnessed in e-business negotiations, thereby contributing to the broader field of international business and intercultural communication.
The findings of this study are expected to offer practical guidance for e-business professionals, enabling them to conduct negotiations more effectively by enhancing their understanding of cultural dynamics. Ultimately, this investigation contributes to the broader understanding of how cultural differences in negotiation can impact e-business performance, enhancing organizational effectiveness and providing a framework for improving negotiation practices in an increasingly globalized marketplace.
In this section, we will explore the intricate dynamics of intercultural negotiation and its critical role in the success of e-business ventures. We will begin by examining the theoretical foundations of intercultural negotiation, highlighting the significance of cultural intelligence (CQ) in shaping negotiation strategies and outcomes. This will lead to a discussion on the impact of trust and relationship building in negotiations, particularly in virtual environments where personal interactions are limited. We will then analyze the importance of adaptability and emotional intelligence (EI) in negotiating across cultural boundaries, emphasizing how these competencies contribute to effective communication and collaboration. Finally, we will identify gaps in the existing literature, focusing on the need for empirical research that bridges theoretical concepts with practical applications in e-business contexts, setting the stage for our own exploratory study.
Intercultural negotiation is the complex process in which cultural dynamics, individual behaviors, and situational factors shape how parties engage in discussions and make decisions (Hou, 2023). As globalization accelerates, the demand for effective intercultural negotiation skills in business has intensified. Organizations must understand the nuances of diverse cultural norms and practices to navigate the negotiation landscape successfully (ALI, 2022; Fisher, 2014).
Research consistently demonstrates that culture significantly influences negotiation styles, tactics, and outcomes. In (Hofstede, 1980) cultural dimensions theory provides a framework for understanding how values in different cultures affect behavior. For example, individualistic cultures such as the United States often emphasize direct communication and assertiveness, while collectivist cultures, such as Japan, may prioritize indirect communication and group consensus, placing a higher value on relationships than individual gain (Gelfand et al., 2001; Hofstede, 1980).
Moreover, cultural nuances extend to time orientation. Monochronic cultures, such as Germany and the United States, perceive time linearly and value punctuality, while polychronic cultures, such as those in Latin America and the Middle East, are more flexible with time, placing more emphasis on relationships over strict schedules (Hall, 1983). This highlights the necessity of tailoring negotiation approaches to fit different cultural expectations and preferences.
Cultural Intelligence (CQ) is a critical competency enabling individuals to navigate and adapt to culturally diverse environments effectively (Iskhakova & Ott, 2020; Klafehn et al., 2015; Rose & Kumar, 2008). It encompasses four dimensions: cognitive (knowledge of different cultures), metacognitive (awareness of one's own cultural assumptions), motivational (willingness to engage with other cultures), and behavioral (ability to adapt behavior in cross-cultural interactions) (Van Dyne et al., 2012).
Recent studies emphasize CQ’s role in virtual negotiations, where non-verbal cues are often limited. As e-business negotiations grow, CQ becomes essential for interpreting and managing diverse communication styles. For example, negotiators with high CQ can avoid miscommunication by adapting their behavior to the virtual negotiation environment (Iskhakova & Ott, 2020). Additionally, CQ facilitates smoother negotiations by reducing cultural misunderstandings, leading to better business relationships and more favorable outcomes (Van Dyne et al., 2012).
Trust is a cornerstone of successful negotiation, especially in intercultural contexts. The ability to establish trust significantly influences negotiation dynamics and outcomes (Lewicki & Brinsfield, 2012). In cultures where trust is rooted in personal relationships, such as many Asian countries, negotiators often need to build rapport before addressing substantive issues. In contrast, Western cultures may prioritize efficiency and results, adopting a more transactional approach (Cohen, 1997; Salacuse, 2015; Usunier, 2003).
Trust-building is equally critical in e-business settings, where digital transactions can often feel impersonal. Studies have shown that trust in online negotiations, particularly in cross-border contexts, is a major determinant of transaction success. Trust allows negotiators to share information more openly, which leads to stronger, long-term business relationships and fewer conflicts (HAMMAMI & DELLECH, 2022). Additionally, the research suggests that building trust virtually can be more challenging due to the lack of physical presence, requiring negotiators to leverage both CQ and digital communication strategies to foster trust (Rousseau, 1998; Thompson, 2023).
Adaptability is essential for negotiators operating in multicultural environments. The ability to modify one’s strategies based on cultural cues can enhance negotiation effectiveness (Graham, 1993). Adaptability includes adjusting communication styles and re-evaluating negotiation objectives based on cultural context.
As businesses continue to digitize, negotiators must be particularly adaptable in virtual negotiations, where cultural cues can be less apparent. Studies, including those cited by (Van Dyne et al., 2012) have found that negotiators who adapt their strategies based on both cultural and digital contexts are more successful in achieving favorable outcomes in virtual business deals.
Emotional Intelligence (EI) is vital in the negotiation process, particularly in intercultural contexts where misunderstandings or value differences can escalate emotions (Evans, 2024; Sharma et al., 2017). EI involves recognizing, understanding, and managing one's own emotions and those of others (Igbokwe et al., 2023). Research shows that negotiators with high EI are better at managing interpersonal relationships, leading to more favorable negotiation outcomes (Goleman & Cherniss, 2024).
In intercultural negotiations, EI helps negotiators navigate emotional complexities (Igbokwe et al., 2023; Jordan & Troth, 2021). In (Schlegel et al., 2024) found that negotiators with high EI are more adept at recognizing and addressing emotional cues, which facilitates trust-building and collaboration (Sharma et al., 2017). This emotional regulation becomes even more important in e-business contexts, where virtual negotiations can lead to misinterpretation of tone and intent due to the lack of physical presence.
While much research exists on intercultural negotiation and cultural intelligence, several gaps remain. First, much of the literature is theoretical, with limited empirical studies on the practical application of these concepts in real-world e-business contexts. Research exploring how cultural intelligence and negotiation strategies impact business outcomes, such as sales performance and partnership success, is scarce.
Second, despite widespread study of cultural dimensions, there remains little consensus on how specific cultural traits influence negotiation strategies. Future research should aim to clarify these relationships, possibly through longitudinal studies that assess negotiation outcomes over time. Moreover, the influence of digital tools and virtual environments on negotiation remains under-explored, as discussed in (Sharma et al., 2017).
This study integrates concepts from cultural intelligence theory, negotiation theory, and e-business performance literature to form a comprehensive framework. This framework elucidates the nuanced relationship between intercultural negotiation strategies and successful outcomes in e-business.
Cultural Intelligence (CQ)
In (Schlegel et al., 2024) outlined the dimensions of CQ, which this study affirms as essential for navigating multicultural environments. Individuals with high CQ can recognize and adapt to cultural nuances, leading to more effective negotiation outcomes (Earley & Mosakowski, 2004; Kazemitabar et al., 2024).
Intercultural Negotiation Strategies
The findings support the use of culturally appropriate negotiation strategies. In (Fisher, 2014) interest-based approach, which emphasizes understanding underlying interests, aligns with participants' experiences in fostering collaborative outcomes. The necessity of adaptability, as highlighted by (Gelfand et al., 2006), is crucial in cross-cultural negotiations.
Cultural Awareness in Negotiation
Participants highlighted the importance of cultural awareness, reflecting (LeBaron, 2003; Moore & Woodrow, 2010) findings that successful negotiators must deeply understand cultural differences to avoid misunderstandings and develop effective communication strategies.
Challenges in Intercultural Negotiation
Miscommunication and cultural biases, as reported by participants, align with (Salacuse, 2005) findings, underscoring the need for strategies to mitigate potential intercultural pitfalls.
E-Business Performance
The study reveals a direct link between culturally informed negotiations and improved e-business performance, supporting research by (Magal & Levenburg, 2005), which highlights that successful intercultural interactions enhance customer satisfaction and brand loyalty in digital commerce.
Cultural Intelligence as a Critical Factor
In (Ang et al., 2007; Rockstuhl et al., 2011) emphasize that negotiators with high CQ can better manage cultural diversity, leading to improved negotiation efficacy, a finding corroborated by this study.
Trust Building
Trust is pivotal in negotiations, aligning with (Druckman & Olekalns, 2013; Friedman, 1993; Moos, 2004), theory that trust fosters cooperation and reduces transaction costs in business relationships.
Adaptability and Emotional Intelligence
In (Goleman & Cherniss, 2024) theory on the interplay between EI and adaptability resonates with participants’ experiences, highlighting the importance of emotional awareness and flexibility in cross-cultural negotiation contexts.
By synthesizing these themes within the theoretical framework, this research enhances the understanding of how cultural intelligence and intercultural negotiation strategies contribute to improved e-business performance.
This study adopts an exploratory qualitative approach, utilizing semi-structured interviews with e-business professionals from diverse cultural backgrounds. Conducted via video conferencing, these interviews sought to reveal participants' experiences, strategies, and perceived challenges in intercultural negotiations. Each session, lasting 45 to 60 minutes, was driven by open-ended questions that delved into various aspects of intercultural negotiation, such as strategies, challenges, and their influence on e-business performance. The recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis to uncover key themes and insights, offering a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between cultural intelligence and negotiation effectiveness.
The choice of a qualitative methodology was rooted in the need to explore the complex social dynamics of intercultural negotiations, which cannot be captured through quantitative measures. This approach enables a detailed exploration of participants' perspectives, highlighting the dynamic influence of cultural factors on negotiation practices.
Participants and Data Collection
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a diverse group of e-business professionals representing various cultural backgrounds. The heterogeneity of the sample, which included participants from different geographic regions, industry sectors, and levels of e-business experience, ensured a comprehensive view of negotiation strategies and cultural insights. Each interview, lasting approximately 45 to 60 minutes, was held via video conferencing platforms to accommodate flexibility and accessibility. The interviews were guided by open-ended questions covering:
• Experiences in intercultural negotiation.
• Strategies used in cross-cultural settings.
• Perceived challenges and successes.
• Reflections on how these strategies impacted overall business performance.
With participant consent, interviews were recorded, transcribed for analysis, and supplemented by observational notes capturing non-verbal cues and contextual subtleties, enhancing the richness of the data collected.
Themes and Discussion
In this section, we delve into the key themes emerging from the qualitative interviews conducted with e-business professionals engaged in intercultural negotiations. The insights shared by participants illuminate the multifaceted nature of negotiation in a globalized context, emphasizing the interplay between cultural awareness, emotional intelligence, and adaptability. Each theme highlights the critical factors that influence negotiation effectiveness and the subsequent impact on e-business performance.
The discussion begins with cultural awareness, a foundational element that participants identified as vital for successful negotiation outcomes. Following this, we explore the challenges encountered in intercultural negotiations, particularly the miscommunications and biases that can arise when parties operate across cultural boundaries. We then analyze the direct correlation between culturally informed negotiation strategies and enhanced e-business performance, demonstrating how these strategies can lead to tangible business benefits.
Subsequent themes address the significance of cultural intelligence and trust-building in fostering successful partnerships, as well as the necessity of adaptability and flexibility in negotiation approaches. Participants emphasized the importance of thorough preparation and research into cultural contexts, underscoring the role of emotional intelligence in managing interpersonal dynamics during negotiations. Collectively, these themes provide a comprehensive understanding of the intricate landscape of intercultural negotiations and their implications for e-business success.
Cultural Awareness in Negotiation
Participants emphasized the critical role of cultural awareness in negotiation success. One participant remarked, “Understanding cultural norms helps me avoid potential pitfalls in negotiations.” Adjusting communication styles to fit cultural expectations facilitated smoother interactions. Another noted, “When I know what is valued in another culture, I can tailor my approach effectively, leading to better outcomes.”
Challenges Encountered in Intercultural Negotiation
Miscommunication and cultural biases were common challenges discussed by participants. As one participant stated, “I once assumed my counterpart from a different culture would communicate directly, but instead, they were quite indirect, leading to misunderstandings.” Recognizing and proactively addressing these issues is vital for overcoming barriers in intercultural negotiations, reinforcing the importance of cultural intelligence.
E-Business Performance
The study revealed a direct link between intercultural negotiation strategies and enhanced e-business performance. Participants reported that culturally informed negotiations led to increased sales, customer satisfaction, and brand loyalty. “By adapting my negotiation tactics to fit the culture of my clients, I've seen a noticeable improvement in customer satisfaction,” shared one participant, emphasizing the tangible benefits of cultural adaptability.
Cultural Intelligence
Cultural intelligence was identified as a crucial factor in negotiating effectively across cultures. A participant noted, “Having cultural intelligence means I can empathize and adapt to the needs of my counterparts, which improves our negotiations.” This ability to navigate cultural complexities was underscored as essential for fostering successful international partnerships.
Trust Building
Trust emerged as a foundational element in intercultural negotiations. One participant highlighted that building long-term relationships based on transparency and reciprocity significantly influenced their negotiation effectiveness. “Trust is essential. When my counterparts feel secure in our relationship, negotiations flow much more smoothly,” they stated.
Adaptability and Flexibility
The necessity of adaptability in negotiation strategies was frequently mentioned. Participants noted that remaining flexible and responsive to cultural differences was essential for navigating the complexities of intercultural negotiations. As one participant remarked, “If I go into a negotiation with a rigid plan, I miss opportunities to connect and adapt based on what my counterpart needs.”
Importance of Preparation and Research
Thorough preparation, including research into cultural contexts, was emphasized as critical for successful negotiations. A participant shared, “Understanding my counterpart’s culture before negotiations sets realistic expectations and helps me develop effective strategies.” This preparation allowed them to enter negotiations with confidence and cultural insight.
Emotional Intelligence in Negotiation
Emotional intelligence played a pivotal role in managing interpersonal dynamics. Participants acknowledged that recognizing and responding to the emotions of counterparts facilitated better communication and conflict resolution. One participant explained, “By being attuned to the emotional cues of my counterparts, I can navigate difficult conversations more effectively.”
This exploratory qualitative study elucidates the significant relationship between intercultural negotiation strategies, cultural intelligence, and e-business performance. The insights gathered underscore the necessity of adapting negotiation tactics to cultural contexts, which leads to enhanced sales, customer satisfaction, and brand loyalty. Cultural intelligence emerges as a vital competency that enables negotiators to navigate cultural complexities effectively.
The findings of this study have important managerial implications. E-business leaders should prioritize cultural intelligence training and awareness among their negotiation teams, fostering a culture that values adaptability and understanding of diverse cultural contexts. By equipping employees with the necessary skills to engage in culturally informed negotiations, organizations can enhance their competitive edge in global markets. Furthermore, implementing structured programs that promote long-term relationship-building with international partners can lead to more fruitful negotiations and improved business outcomes.
Future research should delve deeper into specific cultural dimensions influencing negotiation strategies, thereby enriching the understanding of intercultural dynamics in the digital economy. Investigating how various cultural frameworks (e.g., Hofstede’s dimensions, Hall’s context theory) interact with negotiation strategies could provide deeper insights into effective practices. Additionally, exploring the role of technology in facilitating intercultural negotiations, such as the use of virtual communication tools, could be valuable. This exploration could inform best practices for e-business professionals engaged in international negotiations, ultimately contributing to the evolving discourse on cultural intelligence and e-business performance.
ALI, A. (2022). Cultivating Connections: Exploring the Influence of User-Generated Content on Social and Consumer Brand Engagement.
Ali, A. A. (2023). Negotiation : Skills and Applications.
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and organization review, 3(3), 335-371.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Brett, J. M. (2000). Culture and negotiation. International journal of psychology, 35(2), 97-104.
Chaudhary, P. (2024). Selling and negotiation skills : A pragmatic approach. Taylor & Francis.
Cohen, R. (1997). Negotiating across cultures : International communication in an interdependent world. US institute of Peace Press.
Corbitt, B. J. (2003). Globalization, culture and e-business. In E-commerce and cultural values (p. 1-16). IGI Global.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Drake, L. E. (1995). Negotiation styles in intercultural communication. International Journal of Conflict Management, 6(1), 72-90.
Druckman, D., & Olekalns, M. (2008). Emotions in negotiation. Group decision and negotiation, 17, 1-11.
Druckman, D., & Olekalns, M. (2013). Motivational primes, trust, and negotiators’ reaction to a crisis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(6), 966-990.
Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2004). Cultural intelligence. Harvard business review, 82(10), 139-146.
Evans, K. (2024). Role of Emotional Intelligence in Negotiation Effectiveness during International Trade Conflicts in Burundi. European Journal of Conflict Management, 4(1), 47-56.
Ferdoush, M. A. (2023). Navigating the ‘field’ : Reflexivity, uncertainties, and negotiation along the border of Bangladesh and India. Ethnography, 24(2), 176-196.
Fisher, J. (2014). Managing environmental conflict. The handbook of conflict resolution: theory and practice, 3.
Friedman, R. A. (1993). Bringing mutual gains bargaining to labor negotiations : The role of trust, understanding, and control. Human Resource Management, 32(4), 435-459.
Gelfand, M. J., Major, V. S., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L. H., & O’Brien, K. (2006). Negotiating relationally : The dynamics of the relational self in negotiations. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 427-451.
Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., Holcombe, K. M., Dyer, N., Ohbuchi, K.-I., & Fukuno, M. (2001). Cultural influences on cognitive representations of conflict : Interpretations of conflict episodes in the United States and Japan. Journal of applied psychology, 86(6), 1059.
Goleman, D., & Cherniss, C. (2024). Optimal Leadership and Emotional Intelligence. Leader to Leader, 2024(113), 7-12.
Graham, J. L. (1993). The Japanese negotiation style : Characteristics of a distinct approach. Negot. J., 9, 123.
Hall, E. (1983). Understanding Cultural Differences : German, Frech, And Americans. Intercultural Press.
HAMMAMI, H., & DELLECH, D. (2022). For A Better Understanding of Opposing Negotiator Behavior. International Journal of Business & Economics (IJBE), 7(2), 51-79.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International studies of management & organization, 10(4), 15-41.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures : The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1), 8.
Hou, M. (2023). Face and Identity in Intercultural Conflict Management. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(2), 88-96.
Huang, H. (2023). On the Skills and Basic Connotation of Business Negotiation. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 4(1), 62-65.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Igbokwe, I. C., Egboka, P. N., Thompson, C. C., Etele, A. V., Anyanwu, A. N., Okeke-James, N. J., & Uzoekwe, H. E. (2023). Emotional intelligence : Practices to manage and develop it. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 1(4), 42-48.
Iskhakova, M., & Ott, D. L. (2020). Working in culturally diverse teams : Team-level cultural intelligence (CQ) development and team performance. Journal of International Education in Business, 13(1), 37-54.
Jamshed, S., & Majeed, N. (2023). Mapping knowledge-sharing behavior through emotional intelligence and team culture toward optimized team performance. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 29(1/2), 63-89.
Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2021). Managing emotions during team problem solving : Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. In Emotion and performance (p. 195-218). CRC Press.
Kazemitabar, M., Mirzapour, H., Akhshi, M., Vatankhah, M., Hatami, J., & Doleck, T. (2024). Power of nonverbal behavior in online business negotiations : Understanding trust, honesty, satisfaction, and beyond. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(4), 1442-1459.
Klafehn, J., Banerjee, P. M., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2015). Navigating cultures : The role of metacognitive cultural intelligence. In Handbook of cultural intelligence (p. 336-349). Routledge.
LeBaron, M. (2003). Culture-based negotiation styles. Beyond intractability.
Lewicki, R. J., & Brinsfield, C. (2012). Measuring trust beliefs and behaviours. Handbook of research methods on trust, 29.
Magal, S. R., & Levenburg, N. M. (2005). Using importance-performance analysis to evaluate e-business strategies among small businesses. 176a-176a.
Miller, O. (2014). The negotiation style : A comparative study between the stated and in-practice negotiation style. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 200-209.
Moore, C. W., & Woodrow, P. J. (2010). Handbook of global and multicultural negotiation. John Wiley & Sons.
Moos, L. (2004). Regulation and trust : Negotiating relationship. In Passionate principalship (p. 105-122). Routledge.
Olekalns, M., & Druckman, D. (2014). With feeling : How emotions shape negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 30(4), 455-478.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Ramdani, A., Raji, R., & Ahmad, M. K. (2024). Exploring the concept and the communication principles of negotiation among Islamic corporate organizations. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(4), 1115-1135.
Reif, J. A., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2022). Should I Negotiate? A Model of Negotiation Initiation Considering Psychological Person-Environment Transactions. Negotiation & Conflict Management Research, 15(2).
Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Annen, H. (2011). Beyond general intelligence (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ) : The role of cultural intelligence (CQ) on cross-border leadership effectiveness in a globalized world. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 825-840.
Rose, R. C., & Kumar, N. (2008). A Review on Individual Differences and Cultural Intelligence. Journal of International Social Research, 1(4).
Rousseau, D. M. (1998). Trust in Organizations : Frontiers of Theory and Research.
Saidi, K. (2024). Business E-Negotiation. Contemporary Trends in Innovative Marketing Strategies, 157.
Salacuse, J. W. (2005). Your place or mine ? Deciding where to negotiate. In Negotiating Life : Secrets for Everyday Diplomacy and Deal Making (p. 153-161). Springer.
Salacuse, J. W. (2015). The global negotiator : Making, managing and mending deals around the world in the twenty-first century. St. Martin’s Press.
Sarkar, A. (2010). Navigating the rough seas of global business negotiation : Reflection on cross-cultural issues and some corporate experiences. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 3(2).
Schlegel, K., de Jong, M., & Boros, S. (2024). Conflict management 101 : How emotional intelligence can make or break a manager. International Journal of Conflict Management.
Shapiro, D. L. (2002). Negotiating emotions. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 20(1), 67-82.
Sharma, H. (2023). The Importance of Website Usability in Digital Marketing : A Review. London Journal of Research In Computer Science and Technology, 23(3), 25-32.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Sharma, S., Agarwal, A., Agarwal, I., & Gupta, A. (2017). A cross-cultural examination on the role of emotional intelligence in predicting negotiation effectiveness. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 82(4), 20-22.
Thompson, L. (2023). The Virtually Intelligent Negotiator : Building Trust and Maximizing Economic Gain in E-Negotiations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(5), 347-354.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Usunier, J.-C. (2003). Cultural aspects of international business negotiations. International business negotiations, 2, 97-135.
Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., Ng, K. Y., Rockstuhl, T., Tan, M. L., & Koh, C. (2012). Sub-dimensions of the four factor model of cultural intelligence : Expanding the conceptualization and measurement of cultural intelligence. Social and personality psychology compass, 6(4), 295-313.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Received: 04-Oct-2024, Manuscript No. AMSJ-24-15314; Editor assigned: 05-Oct-2024, PreQC No. AMSJ-24-15314(PQ); Reviewed: 20-Nov-2024, QC No. AMSJ-24-15314; Revised: 26-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. AMSJ-24-15314(R); Published: 15-Dec-2024