Research Article: 2021 Vol: 24 Issue: 1S
Januar Eko Prasetio, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
Sabihaini, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
Bambang Bintarto, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
Anindyo Aji Susanto, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
Gita Astyka Rahmanda, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
Rusdiyanto, Universitas Airlangga and Universitas Gresik
Arif Syafi'ur Rochman, Universitas Gresik
Nawang Kalbuana, Politeknik Penerbangan Indonesia Curug
Objective: This study aims to identify a summary of Corporate Social Responsibility - Community Development and Empowerment Program (CSR-PPM) studies in the mineral and coals mining industry in Indonesia and identify the main concerns of criticism of the implementation of CSR-PPM in Indonesia.
Design/methodology/approach: This research uses library research methods. Literature collected in the form of: scientific articles, books, or internet sites containing relevant information or data. Data analysis is done with annotated bibliography techniques. This research literature data is obtained by accessing a popular literature database.
Findings: CSR-PPM mining industry in Indonesia is a legitimized strategic instrument to address environmental social issues and contribute to regional development and national and long-term dimensional.
Implications: The recommended implementation model is a collaboration model involving cross-sector stakeholders by synchronizing internal corporate rules with regional development schemes. Originality: The use of annotated bibliography data analysis techniques that have never been used by previous research.
Corporate Social Responsibility, Community Development and Empowerment Program, CSR-PPM
Since the government enacted the Law on Limited Liability Company (No. 40 of 2007), the characteristics of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Indonesia have shifted toward mandatory CSR. (Andrini, 2016; Chang, 2018; Kriyantono, 2015; Waagstein, 2011). Included in Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection fund Management, Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment, Regulation No 47 of the Government of 2012 on social and environmental responsibility for limited companies are also regulations related to CSR implementation obligations by companies in Indonesia. This rule applies to companies in Indonesia in general, not least companies in the coal mining and mineral industry.
CSR implementation in the coal mining and mineral industry (Minerba) received great attention at the global level as well as at the national level due to the social and environmental impacts of mining activities (Jenkins, 2004; Jenkins & Obara, 2006; Rela et al., 2020). CSR obligations of the coal mining and mineral in Indonesia refer to 2 models, namely the Partnership and Community Development Program (PKBL) model implemented by state-owned mining companies (BUMN) and the Community Development and Empowerment Program (PPM) model for general mineral and coal mining companies. The PKBL model refers to the principles and standards of sustainability reporting governed by GRI (Global Reporting Initiatives). PPM model on the other hand is a form of implementation of unique CSR obligations and accommodates the characteristics of government administration management in Indonesia. This study focuses more attention on the second model, given the uniqueness of these characteristics.
This research was conducted for several purposes, namely: identifying a summary of PPM CSR studies in the mineral and coals mining industry in Indonesia and identifying the main concerns of criticism of the implementation of CSR PPM in Indonesia. For this purpose, the study is organized in several parts. The second and third sections contain a review of CSR regulations in Indonesia and research methods. Analysis of bibliographic annotations and conclusions is presented in the fourth and fifth sections respectively.
CSR Regulation of Mineral and Coals Mining in Indonesia
For companies in Indonesia, CSR implementation is compulsory since the following regulations are enacted, namely: Investment Law No. 25 of 2007, Environmental Protection and Managerial Law No. 32 of 2009, Law No 40, 2007 on Limited Liability Companies, and Limited Companies Government Regulation No 47, 2012. In addition to these general rules, the structures of the rules specifically applied related to the implementation of CSR in the mining industry are:
a. Law No 22, 2001 on Oil and Gas
b. Law No 3, 2020 (an amendment to Mineral and Coals Mining Act No. 4 of 2009)
c. Geothermal Law No. 21 of 2014
d. Government Regulation No 24/2012 on the implementation of mineral and coals activities
e. The State-Owned Enterprises Partnership Program and its Community development programme (Soe PER-02/MBU/04/2020 third amendment PER-09/MBU/07/2015)
f. Community development and empowerment by Energy and Minerals Minister (Regulation No 41 of 2016)
g. Mineral and Coal Mining Regulation (Energy and Minerals Minister) No 25 of 2018
h. Minister for Energy and Minerals Resources Decree No 1824 2018 on Community Development and Empowerment Guidelines.
CSR Model of PPM Mineral and Coals Mining Industry
The CSR model of the national mineral and coals industry is regulated through 2 ministries, namely: the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and the Ministry of State-Owned Enterprises and. The implementation model of the CSR to the General Mining and Coal Industries is regulated and implemented with the Community Development and Electricity Program of the Ministry of Energy and Minerals Resources (PPM). CSR-PPM is a program aimed at improving both the individual and the collective economic, educational, socio-cultural, healthcare and living conditions of people around the mine in order to enhance the standard of living of the people around it (Kementerian ESDM, 2016).
CSR-PPM is implemented through 8 areas, namely: health, education, real income level or employment, socio-cultural, economic independence, community participation in environmental management, the establishment of PPM supporting institutions and the development of PPM supporting infrastructure. The implementation of CSR-PPM refers to the PPM Master Plan (RI-PPM) prepared by the Governor in accordance with Medium-Term National and Regional Development Plan (RPJMN/D) and involves the regent/mayor in the region of mining business activities. Ri-PPM document contains each activity related to 8 specified areas in line with the areas that are the focus of basic government services (Kementerian ESDM, 2018).
This study uses library research methods by collecting literature relevant to research topics (Juanamasta, 2019; Kalbuana & Prasetyo, 2021; Prabowo, Rochmatulaili, Rusdiyanto & Sulistyowati, 2020; Luwihono, 2021; Prasetyo et al., 2021; Prasetyo, Aliyyah, Rusdiyanto & Nartasari, 2021b; Prasetyo, Aliyyah, Rusdiyanto & Suprapti, 2021; Indra Prasetyo, 2021; Rusdiyanto & Hidayat, 2020; Rusdiyanto, Agustia, Soetedjo & Septiarini, 2020; Rusdiyanto & Karman, 2020; Susanto, 2021; Shabbir, 2021; Aliyyah, 2021; Hastomo, Karno, Kalbuana, Meiriki & Sutarno, 2021; Kalbuana & Suryati, 2021; Kustiningsih, 2020; Prasetyo, Aliyyah, Rusdiyanto & Nartasari, 2021a; Prasetyo & Endarti, 2021) Literature collected in the form of: scientific articles, books, or internet sites containing relevant information or data (Mann, 2015). Data analysis is done with annotated bibliography techniques. This research literature data is obtained by accessing a database of popular literature with the following strategies:
1. The search for specific literature on CSR-PPM is conducted using keywords: Social Responsibility, Mineral and Coal Mining, Community Development and Empowerment, PPM and all equivalents and combinations of these keywords.
2. The literature obtained from the first strategy is further traced to obtain details of the attributes most relevant to the topics of CSR, Mining, Community Development and Empowerment/PPM. Validation of adequacy criteria of literature data is determined from the index of the source of literature.
Bibliography Annotation CSR-PPM Mining Industry in Indonesia
Annotations Bibiliografi Literature CSR PPM mining industry in Indonesia conducted in 32 articles in the following table 1:
Table 1 Csr Articles of PPM Mining Industry in Indonesia |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | Title | Year | Source | Publisher | Index |
Dady prayogo | Evaluasi program corporate social responsibility dan community | 2011 | Maara human behavior studies in asia | Ui | GS* |
Patricia rinwigati waagstein | The mandatory corporate social responsibility in indonesia: Problems and implications | 2011 | Journal of business ethics | Springer | Scopus |
Romi marnelly | Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Review of theory and practice in Indonesia | 2012 | Business application journal | Uii | Sinta 5 |
Anggraeniprimawati | Peranan corporate social responsibility in community empowerment in Tabalong, South Kalimantan | 2013 | Sosio knsepsia | Kementerian sosial | Sinta 2 |
Asa ria pranoto,dede yusuf | CSR program based on community empowerment towards post-mining economic independence in Sarijaya Village | 2014 | Journal of social science and political science | Ugm | Scopus |
Antonius suhadi,ar febrian, sri turatmiyah | Model Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) coal mining company in Lahat district towards community empowerment based on local wisdom | 2014 | Journal of legal dynamics | Jenderal Soedirman University | Sinta 2 |
Hartini retnaningsih | Permasalahan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 36 / 5000 Translation results in the context of community empowerment |
2015 | Aspirations: Journal of social problems | Dpr ri | Sinta 2 |
Jamal wiwoho | Model legal responsibility for the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to improve welfare | 2015 | Sustainable Competitive Advantage(SCA) | General soedirman university | |
Sri suryaningsum,irhas effendy, r. Hendri gusaptono | Corporate social responsibility for improving the community's economy: The best model for mining companies | 2015 | Economic bulletin | Upn Veterans of Yogyakarta | GS* |
Senen machmud | Study of the utilization of corporate social responsibility funds as | 2015 | Journal of economics, business & entrepreneurship | Stie pasundan | Sinta 4 |
Dede abdul hasyir | CSR planning in mining companies: The need to | 2016 | Maranatha accounting journal | christian university | Sinta 5 |
Laurensia andrini | Mandatory corporate social responsibility in indonesia | 2016 | pulpit of law | Ugm | Sinta 2 |
Hasbi zaidii roberta zufhi surya, juslan | Analysis of CSR strategies and synchronization with government programs in the development of the downstream Indragiri district | 2016 | Bappeda Journal | Bappeda indragiri hilir | GS* |
Syamsul bahri | The role of CSR in supporting community development financing in the regions | 2016 | News journal | Ums | GS* |
Widya hasan situmeang, mahmudi siwi | The relationship between the performance of the CSR program and the potential for social conflict in the community around the mining area | 2017 | Journal of communication science and community development | Ipb | GS* |
Irfan ido | Mining corporate social responsibility (CSR) policy and its effect on community welfare (case study) in Koeono village… | 2018 | Journal publicuho | Universitas halu oleo | Sinta 6 |
Wezy ferlianta,angga praditya | Government collaboration with mining companies through community development and empowerment programs | 2018 | Policy analyst journal | Lembaga administrasi negara | GS* |
M oktavia, m yusuf, a saptawan | The impact implementation program of corporate social resposibility of pt. Kuansing inti makmur toward society development around mining area | 2018 | Sriwijaya journal of evironment | Universitas sriwijaya | Sinta 4 |
Mukti fajar | Corporate social responsibility in indonesia:regulation and implementation issues | 2018 | Journal of legal ethics and regulatory issues | Na | Scopus |
Soonpeel edgar chang | Has indonesia's unique progessivism in mandating corporate social responsibility achieved its ends? | 2018 | Sriwijaya law review | Universitas sriwijaya | Scopus |
Sri indarti | The role of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) towards the development micro and small and entrepreneurs using patnershipand community development program (pkbl) in pekanbaru | 2018 | International journal of law and management | Emerald publishing limited | Scopus |
M chairul basrun umanailo | Integration of community empowerment models of community empowerment | 2019 | Proceeding of community development | Lipi | GS* |
Denny riezky pratama | The role of social entrepreneurship in community empowerment: three stories from East Kutai | 2019 | Umbara: Indonesian journal of anthropology | Padjadjaran University | Sinta 4 |
Agustinus simandjuntak,susilo handoyo sri ayu astuti | Community empowerment in coal mining business activities based on the principle of justice in East Kalimantan | 2019 | De facto journal | Balikpapan University | GS* |
Brenada sahat perdamean | Juridical analysis of community development and empowerment in mining business activities based on the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources No. 41 of 2016 | 2019 | Balikpapan University | University of Northern Sumatra | GS* |
S. Suwandi, s.sukaris, abdurahman faris | CSR model in strengthening social capital and the role of community institutions | 2019 | Accountability | Hidayatullah Sharif Union | Sinta 4 |
Hari sutra disemadi,p prananingtyas | Corporate social responsibility (CSR) policy as a legal strategy in community empowerment in Indonesia | 2020 | Journal of Law | Bandung law high school | Sinta 2 |
Bambang ari satria | Collaborative governance in the ppm program mineral and coal in the village of Bukit Layang, Bangka Regency |
2020 | National conference on administrative science | Police Seize Bandung | GS* |
Alfianita mariska asfandi, sundek hariyadi | Study on the success of corporate social responsibility on community resilience: empirical evidence in the nickel mining industry in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia | 2020 | Proceedings of the annual profession theme | Perhapi | GS* |
Iskandar zainuddin rela, abd hair awang, zaimah ramil,yani taufik sarmila md.sum, mahazan muhammad | Effect of corporate social responsibility on community resilience: empirical evidence in the nickel mining industry insouth east sulawesi indonesia | 2020 | Sustainability(switzerland) | Mdpi | Scopus |
Rabin ibnu zainal | Comparison of perceptions between stakeholders in CSR synergies and regional development programs | 2020 | Pareto: Journal of economics and public policy | Universitas prof. Dr.hazairin | Sinta 4 |
Jony puspa kusuma, andi lopa ginting | Kolaka district government strategy in managing corporate social responsibility (CSR) programsSS | 2021 | Scientific Journal of reflection | SMA pustek Banten | Sinta 4 |
*GS: Google Scholar, **Sinta: Journal Index Of The Ministry Of Cultural Education And Higher Education Technology Research |
The summary of bibliographic annotations is divided into several themes presented in the following figure 1:
CSR-PPM is a form of legally legitimized corporate obligation (Disemadi & Prananingtyas, 2020) to resolve conflicts (Situmeang & Siwi, 2017) environmental social issues around the mining industry (Astuti & Simandjuntak, 2018; Perdamean, 2019; Primawati, 2013; Suryaningsum, Effendy, Gusaptono, Effendy, & Gusaptono, 2015), creating community resilience (Rela et al., 2020), community self-reliance (Bahri, 2016; Indarti, 2018; Satria, 2020), strengthening social and institutional capital of the community (Suwandi, Sukaris, & Faris, 2019) as well as an alternative to regional development financing, given the limited financial capabilities of local governments (Bahri, 2016; Machmud, 2015). Nevertheless, the implementation of PPM CSR in Indonesia is inseparable from some criticisms in its implementation.
Criticism of the implementation of PPM CSR in regulatory design aspects includes: semantic interpretation of regulations (Gayo, 2012), weaknesses in planning aspects and compliance with global regulations such as MDG (Millennium Development Goals) and ISO development targets (Pranoto & Yusuf, 2016), the absence of objective parameters regarding the proper form of PPM program, aspects of community involvement in the planning of ppm forms and types of activities (Astuti & Simandjuntak, 2018; Perdamean, 2019), the need for evaluation mechanisms (Prayogo, 2011; Retnaningsih, 2015) and CSR fund transfer mechanism (Ido, 2018) to ensure the effectiveness of the program and legal certainty in the form of surveillance mechanisms from the government (Andrini, 2016; Wardah & Surya, 2016; Zaidi, Surya, & Juslan, 2016) related to sanctions if it is unable to meet CSR-PPM implementation obligations (Sanjaya, 2021; Wardah & Surya, 2016; Wiwoho, 2015).
Related to the CSR-PPM implementation model criticism includes cross-sector coordination (Government, Corporations and Communities) (Ferlianta & Praditya, 2018; Wardah & Surya, 2016; Zainal, 2020), synchronization with internal company rules (Fajar, 2018; Wardah & Surya, 2016; Zaidi et al., 2016) and development of the role of social entrepreneurship (Pratama, 2019) to maintain the sustainability of the CSR-PPM program. PPM governance improvement strategy can be encwuouraged so that the implementation of PPM CSR is more targeted by involving effective collaboration of stakeholders (Hasyir, 2016; Satria, 2020), synchronization with local government budgeting system (Umanailo, 2019) and intergration with regional development schemes through the Regional Medium Term Development Plan (RPJMD) (Kusuma & Ginting, 2021; Wardah & Surya, 2016; Zainal, 2020) to prevent program overlap with government development plans (Umanailo, 2019). Finally, attention is needed to the CSR-PPM regulatory structure in order to become a national and long-term dimensional regulation (Chang, 2018).
Conclusions
This research resulted in several conclusions as follows:
1. CSR-PPM mining industry in Indonesia is a legitimized strategic instrument to overcome environmental social issues and contribute to regional development.
2. CSR-PPM regulatory design that governs the principles and details of clear guidelines is required as the basis for the development of the CSR-PPM model that is national and long-term dimensional.
3. The recommended implementation model is a collaboration model that involves cross-sector stakeholders by synchronizing internal corporate rules and aligning CSR-PPM attribute characteristics and stages with regional development schemes.
Limitations
This study has some limitations with the use of literature review methods from some studies that also use literature review methods. Bias can occur due to differences in context used by researchers in selected articles.