Journal of International Business Research (Print ISSN: 1544-0222; Online ISSN: 1544-0230 )

Reviews: 2024 Vol: 23 Issue: 2

BEYOND BORDERS: INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Deborah Moir, University of Melbourne, Australia

Citation Information: Moir, D. (2024). Beyond borders: international perspectives on intellectual property rights. Journal of International Business Research, 23(2), 1-3.

Abstract

     

Keywords

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), International Perspectives, Cross-border IP, Policy Harmonization, Counterfeit Goods.

Introduction

The realm of intellectual property rights (IPR) transcends geographical boundaries, presenting a complex web of legal, economic, and cultural considerations in a globalized world (Abbott & Cottier, 1999). Beyond Borders: International Perspectives on Intellectual Property Rights delves into this intricate landscape, offering insights into the multifaceted dimensions of IPR from diverse international viewpoints.

This essay explores key themes, including the legal frameworks, economic implications, technological advancements, and cultural perspectives shaping the global discourse on intellectual property (Besnier, 2018). One of the central pillars of international intellectual property governance is the existence of legal frameworks and international treaties.

These frameworks establish the foundational principles for the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights across borders. Treaties such as the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) set minimum standards for intellectual property protection among member states, fostering international cooperation and harmonization in this domain (Cheek, 2000).

The economic implications of intellectual property rights extend far beyond individual rights holders, shaping global trade, innovation ecosystems, and economic development. Strong IP protection can incentivize innovation and investment by providing creators and innovators with the assurance of exclusive rights to their creations (Cottier & Panizzon, 2004).

However, the balance between incentivizing innovation and ensuring access to knowledge and cultural expression remains a key challenge, particularly in developing countries where issues of affordability and accessibility intersect with intellectual property rights (Grosheide, 2002). Technological advancements have revolutionized the way intellectual property is created, disseminated, and protected.

The digital age has ushered in new challenges and opportunities for intellectual property rights, with issues such as digital piracy, online infringement, and the protection of digital assets becoming increasingly prominent (McGaughey, 2001). Additionally, emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and biotechnology present novel questions regarding patentability, ownership, and regulatory frameworks, necessitating ongoing adaptation and evolution of intellectual property law.

Cultural perspectives play a crucial role in shaping attitudes towards intellectual property rights, with varying traditions, norms, and values influencing perceptions of ownership, creativity, and innovation (Peterson & Hunt, 1997). Indigenous knowledge systems, traditional cultural expressions, and folklore highlight the importance of cultural heritage and collective ownership in contrast to Western notions of individual authorship and proprietary rights.

Balancing the protection of cultural heritage with the promotion of innovation and creativity requires a nuanced understanding of cultural diversity and the recognition of indigenous rights within intellectual property regimes (Sakamoto & D AV ID, 2010). Despite the progress made in international intellectual property governance, numerous challenges persist in ensuring effective protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights across borders.

Jurisdictional issues, enforcement gaps, and the proliferation of counterfeit goods undermine the integrity of intellectual property regimes, posing significant economic and societal risks (Shep, 2008). Moreover, the rise of open innovation models, collaborative creativity, and the sharing economy challenge traditional notions of intellectual property ownership, necessitating innovative approaches to IP governance that reconcile competing interests and foster inclusive innovation ecosystems.

By embracing diverse perspectives and promoting inclusive approaches to intellectual property rights, we can cultivate a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient global intellectual property regime that fosters creativity, innovation, and cultural diversity for generations to come (van Tulder, 2020).

Conclusion

Beyond Borders: International Perspectives on Intellectual Property Rights offers a comprehensive exploration of the complex dynamics shaping the global discourse on intellectual property. From legal frameworks and economic implications to technological advancements and cultural perspectives, the anthology provides valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of intellectual property in a globalized world. As we navigate the challenges and opportunities presented by the digital age and cultural diversity, it is imperative to foster dialogue, collaboration, and innovation in intellectual property governance.

References

Abbott, F., & Cottier, T. (1999). The international intellectual property system: commentary and materials.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Besnier, N. (2018). Sports mobilities across borders: Postcolonial perspectives. In Sports in Postcolonial Worlds (pp. 13-25). Routledge.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Cheek, M. L. (2000). The limits of informal regulatory cooperation in international affairs: A review of the global intellectual property regime. Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev., 33, 277.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Cottier, T., & Panizzon, M. (2004). Legal perspectives on traditional knowledge: The case for intellectual property protection. Journal of International Economic Law, 7(2), 371-399.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Grosheide, F. W. (2002). Crossing Borders: Convergence in the Field of IPRs. Int'l Intell. Prop. L. & Pol'y 85-, 7, 1.

Google Scholar

McGaughey, S. L. (2001). Beyond Institutional Means of Intellectual Property Protection across Borders: Lessons from an Australian MNE. Asia-Pacific Issues in International Business, 192.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Peterson, M. F., & Hunt, J. G. J. (1997). International perspectives on international leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(3), 203-231.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Sakamoto, R., & D AV ID, W. C. (2010). Expanding Across Borders: e Growth of Cross-border Partnerships in Higher Education. In Cross-border partnerships in higher education (pp. 15-27). Routledge.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Shep, S. J. (2008). Books without borders: the transnational turn in book history. In Books Without Borders, Volume 1: The Cross-National Dimension in Print Culture (pp. 13-37). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

van Tulder, R. (2020). The multinational perspective on responsible management: managing risk-responsibility trade-offs across borders. In Research Handbook of Responsible Management (pp. 242-259). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Received: 23-Feb-2023, Manuscript No. jibr-24-14683; Editor assigned: 26-Feb -2023, Pre QC No. jibr-24-14683(PQ); Reviewed: 11-Mar-2024, QC No. jibr-24-14683; Revised: 16-Mar-2024, Manuscript No. jibr-24-14683(R); Published: 23-Mar-2024

Get the App