Keywords

Entrepreneurship Education (EE), Technical Skills, Business Skill and Personal Entrepreneurial Skills.

Introduction

Entrepreneurship is a multi-aspects concept (Bula, 2012). The term of "Entrepreneurship" exists from 1732 years ago when Richard canillton who was the first economist who defines the term to describe any individual who is willing to carry out forms of arbitrage involving the financial risk of a new venture (Minniti and Levesque, 2008). According to Timmons (1989) "entrepreneurship is about creating and building something useful. It is about the ability of taking risks and facing the fear of failure". Drucker (1986) beliefs that entrepreneurship is not science or art, it is a practice with knowledge base, and it is not about just making money, it is about being creative and innovation. Furthermore, researchers found that entrepreneurship as such is still a field with no clear borders and that it lacks a clear conceptual framework (Bruyat and Julien, 2001; Busenitz et al., 2003; Ireland and Webb, 2007; Shane and Venkataraman, 2000).

The entrepreneurship concept is a major subject of study both for the local, state, as well as centralized levels. In the last decade, it has become more known that entrepreneurship is a key driver behind economic growth (Acs et al., 2009:2008). For that, the governments around the world created ways to encourage entrepreneurship, including entrepreneurs financing, and suitable governance and legal protections for contracts (Armour and Cumming, 2006).

According to Fritsch (2013) start-up business additional accelerate structural change, strengthen innovation, and enable more diversity of products and problem solving. This in turn facilitates enhanced competitiveness and growth. In addition, Startups have an inconsistent effect on economic growth because smaller firms have larger growth potential than larger firms (Almus and Nerlinger, 2000). In this regards, Cumming et al. (2014) founds that 1% increase in new business start-up leads to a 24% improvement in the GDP in the subsequent year, reduce unemployment by 13% and increase export by 3%. In related study, Schmiemann (2008) the percentage of entrepreneurial enterprises in total of all enterprises are higher than 95% in most of the developed countries, while 60% of all available workforce are employed in those firms.

Literature Review: Entrepreneurship Education And Entrepreneurs’ Skills

Entrepreneurship Education (EE)

Regarding the Entrepreneurship Education (EE), many researchers give entrepreneurship a significant focus on their studies, McIntyre and Roche (1999) defines entrepreneurship education as the process of passing the necessary skills and concepts to individuals to identify new business opportunities and to reach high level of self-confidence to benefit from such opportunities. In addition, McMullan and long (1987) and McMullan et al. (2002) entrepreneurship education should include skill–building and leadership programs, new product development, creative thinking, and technology innovation. Furthermore, Maritz et al. (2015) defines entrepreneurship education programs as any educational program or process of education for entrepreneurial manners and skills, which help in developing personal qualities. Entrepreneurship education has been classified by Van Gelderen et al. (2015), as one of the most important components of entrepreneurship ecosystem to enhance intentionally and business creation stability.

In related study conducted by Fayolle et al. (2006), entrepreneurship education has three different angles, which are culture/state of mind, behavior and creating specific situations. Education focuses on entrepreneurship as a matter of culture/state cover features that focus on beliefs, values and attitudes associated with entrepreneurship. While, entrepreneurship education focuses on behavior mostly covers skills like opportunities, making decisions and developing social skills. Entrepreneurship education focused on creating specific situations, concerns the creation of new firms and entrepreneurial situations whereas the focus of entrepreneurship education in the past was on the last dimension (venture creation, e.g. writing business plans), many current scholars argue that the real challenge for entrepreneurship education lies within the development of the dimensions (e.g. Gibb, 2002:2009).

Regarding the relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneur performance, the majority of studies on entrepreneurship education indicated a positive or mixed result (Lorz et al., 2011), like Van der Sluis and Van Praag (2007:2008) and Van der Sluis et al. (2005) found it positive, also Karlan and Valdivia (2006) supports that the business training for the people who applied for micro finance to start their own business has a positive effect on their performance. As Peterman and Kennedy (2003) found that the entrepreneurship education programs can significantly change the entrepreneurial intentions of participants. However, recently only two studies found a negative relation between entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurs (Oosterbeek et al., 2010; von Graevenitz et al., 2010).

Overall, the positive impact of the findings made some researchers to call for more researches with robust research methods, Peterman and Kennedy (2003) stated that although researchers have recognized the positive impact from entrepreneurship education, "there has been little rigorous research on its effects." In their analysis of entrepreneurship education, Pittaway and Cope (2007) found that the link between entrepreneurship education and outcomes is still not clear and needs more research.

Fayolle (2006) observed "there is a lack of research regarding the outcomes of entrepreneurship education." Oosterbeek et al. (2010) advice that extra research is needed to recognize the different options of entrepreneurship education programs, and von Graevenitz et al. (2010) says, "Little is known at this point about the effect of these (entrepreneurship) courses."

Entrepreneurship Skills (ES)

According to Do Paco et al. (2011a:2011b) entrepreneurship education can develop skills for entrepreneurship success, and that entrepreneurs will need it in the future. Some entrepreneurs prefer to rely on themselves believing that they have the skill need it to be successful, but once they discover training programs new horizons emerged to their business success and they find teachable skills (Wu and Jung, 2008).

The reason behind the business failure mainly comes from the lack of skills (Dowling, 2003; Zimmerer and Scarborough, 2003). According to Lazear (2004:2005) that individuals who have work experience and educational background, they got a set of various skills become more likely entrepreneurs and make better business progress than others. Regarding the skills behind successful entrepreneurs, each researcher has stated different set of skills. Martin (2015) stated that according to the OECD (2014) annual report, three sets of skills were identified technical skills, business management skills and personal entrepreneurial skills. The technical management include written and oral communication, technical implementation skills and organizing skills (Henry et al., 2005). Beside that it includes environment monitoring, problem solving and interpersonal skills (Martin, 2015). Interpersonal skills were defined by Rungapadiachy (1999) are skills which one needs in order to communicate effectively with another person or a group of people. Regarding environment monitoring, Aguilar (1967) define it as the way which management of the business gather important information about events occurring outside the company to help in assessing the future course of the business.

The business management skills include decision-making, setting goals, human resources management, finance, accounting, marketing, customer relations, negotiating, growth management and compliance with regulations (Martin, 2015). (De Wolf & Schoorlemmer, 2007; Rudmann, 2008; Vesala & Pyysiainen, 2008) stated that management skills are human resources managing skills, financial management skills and general planning skills and (Henry et al., 2005) stated that managerial skills are marketing, accounting and decision-making.

In assessing the importance of business management skills, Thornhill and Amit (2003) they found that the failure of younger entrepreneurs is linked with deficiencies in business management skills. In related study, Landwehr (2005) stated that business management skills are important in the later stages of the business to keep it running. According to Frese and Gielnik (2014), since business situations are very complicated, unpredicted and changing requirements during the business procedure, entrepreneurs must build a specific personality features to be capable of facing this situation, the entrepreneur must act as a leader, investor, inventor, accountant, marketing specialist and top sellers.

Thomas and Mueller (2000) stated that the main difference between entrepreneurs and regular employees is the risk-taking attitude, also the big difference between being and entrepreneurs and being a professional manager in business is that entrepreneurs personally take the risk of loss or profit. However, as stated by Erdem (2001) and Littunen (2000) being an entrepreneur is not only about facing the risk of loss, but by facing the risk of career opportunities, emotional condition, health and family relations, therefore the common sense that when a person decides to be an entrepreneur, he/she must accept all the risk with it.

According to Bolton and lane (2012) stated that innovation and risk taking are strongly related to the intent to become an entrepreneur.

Lazear (2004) developed "Jack-all-trades" theory, which suggests that people with balanced skill are more likely to be entrepreneurs, and those balanced skills can be adopted by getting appropriate education, working in different functions and working for different employers. Moreover, Lazear (2005) mentioned that individuals could invest to learn and get diversified skills through education or job training. Individuals who want to get a career in entrepreneurship choose to learn skills by either education or accepting a variety of positions in the work. While, an individual who has educational background or previous work experience will be more fit to be entrepreneurs. Investigating the impact of entrepreneurial education on entrepreneurs' skills is the focus of this study. Furthermore, Becker (1964); Silva (2007); Unger et al. (2011) found that skills are the most important human outcomes acquired through either formal or non-formal education. While, (Ucbasaran et al., 2008) confirmed that entrepreneurship education is a significant source of skills.

The proposed model is designed based on the literature review. In general, this study proposes the conceptual framework (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Research Conceptual Framework

Conclusion And Recommendations

The study reviewed how entrepreneurship education impacts the level of several skills of entrepreneurs which are technical skills, business management skills and personal entrepreneurial skills. Based on the general review of the study, the following points shall help in improving the entrepreneur market through building solid grounds for entrepreneur to excel and succeed in their businesses. However, improving the entrepreneurial education plays a crucial and important role in providing the necessary skills for an entrepreneur to operate their daily business requirements, and how to face obstacles and challenges that will face them during their entrepreneurial live. In addition, supporting educational institution to provide the necessary support from the government to the educational institutes to introduce programs, specialized for entrepreneurs; as such will improve the quality of education and will then create awareness that are focused on showing the importance entrepreneurship education and skills. The effect of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial skills, the discussion presented in this study show that (technical skills, business management skills and personal entrepreneurial skills) are affected by the level of entrepreneurship education.

References

1. Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., &amli; Strom, R.J. (2009). Entrelireneurshili, growth and liublic liolicy. Cambridge: Cambridge University liress.
2. Acs, Z.J., Desai, S., &amli; Hessels, J. (2008). Entrelireneurshili, economic develoliment and institutions. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 219-234.
3. Aguilar, F.J. (1967). Scanning the business environment. New York: Macmillan Co.
4. Almus, M., &amli; Nerlinger, E.A. (2000). Testing “Gibrat’s Law” for young firms–mliirical results for West Germany. Small Business Economics, 15(1), 1-12.
5. Armour, J., &amli; Cumming, D.J. (2006). The legislative road to Silicon Valley. Oxford Economic lialiers, 58(4), 596- 635.
6. Becker, G.S. (1964). Human caliital: A theatrical and emliirical analysis, with sliecial reference to education. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
7. Bolton, D.L., &amli; Lane, M.D. (2012). Individual entrelireneurial orientation: Develoliment of measurement instrument. Education+Training, 54(33), 219-233.
8. Bruyat, C., &amli; Julien, li., (2001). Defining the field of research in entrelireneurshili. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 165.
9. Bula, H.O. (2012). lierformance of women entrelireneurs in small scale enterlirises (SSEs): Marital and family characteristics. Euroliean Journal of Business and Management, 4(7), 85-99.
10. Busenitz, L.W., West I, G.li., Sheliherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G.N., &amli; Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrelireneurshili research in emergence: liast trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29(3), 285-308.
11. Cumming, D., Johan, S., &amli; Zhang, M., (2014). The economic imliact of entrelireneurshili: Comliaring international datasets. Corliorate Governance: An International Review, 22(2): 162-178.
12. De Wolf, li., &amli; Schoorlemmer, H. (2007). Imliortant trends and required skills: An international synthesis. In de Wolf &amli; Schoorlemmer (eds.): Exliloring the Significance of Entrelireneurshili in Agriculture. Frick, Switzerland: FIBL.
13. Do liaco, A., Ferreira, J., Ralioso, M., &amli; Rodrigues, R.G. (2011a). Entrelireneurial intention among secondary students: Findings from liortugal. International Journal of Entrelireneurshili &amli; Small Business, 13(1), 92- 106.
14. Do liaco, A.F., Ferreira, J.M., Ralioso, M., Rodrigues, R.G., &amli; Dinis, A. (2011b). Behaviors and entrelireneurial intention: Emliirical findings about secondary students. Journal of International Entrelireneurshili, 9(1), 20-38.
15. Dowling, M. (2003). Success and risk factors in new business. In: Dowling, M., &amli; Drumm, H.J. (eds.), Founding management: Successful business growth (lili.19-32). Berlin Heidelberg: Sliringer-Verlag, New York.
16. Drucker, li.F. (1986). Innovation and entrelireneurshili: liractice and lirincililes, (lierennial Library ed.). New York: Harlier &amli; Row.
17. Erdem, F. (2001). A cultural aliliroach toward risk taking liroliensity and tolerance for ambiguity of entrelireneurs. Akdeniz IIBF Dergisi, 2, 43-61.
18. Fayolle, A. (2006). Effect and counter effect of entrelireneurshili education and social context on student's intention. Alililied Economics, 24(2), 509-523.
19. Fayolle, A., Gilly, B.T., &amli; Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the imliact of entrelireneurshili education lirograms: A new methodology. Journal of Euroliean Industrial Training, 30(9), 701-720.
20. Frese, M., &amli; Gielnik, M.M. (2014). The lisychology of entrelireneurshili. Annual Review of Organizational lisychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 413-438.
21. Fritsch, M. (2013). New business formation and regional develoliment: A survey and assessment of the evidence. Foundations and Trends in Entrelireneurshili, 9(3), 249-364.
22. Gibb, A. (2002). Creating conducive environments for learning and entrelireneurshili: Living with, dealing with, creating and enjoying uncertainty and comlilexity. Industry and Higher Education, 16(3), 134-148.
23. Gibb, A. (2009). Meeting the develoliment needs of owner managed small enterlirise: A discussion of the centrality of action learning. Journal Action Learning: Research and liractice, 6(3), 209-227.
24. Henry, C., Hill, F., &amli; Leitch, C. (2005). Entrelireneurshili educational and training: Can entrelireneurshili be taught? Education+Training, 47(3), 158-169.
25. Ireland, R.D., &amli; Webb, J.W. (2007). A cross-discililinary exliloration of entrelireneurshili research. Journal of Management, 33(6), 891-927.
26. Karlan, D., &amli; Valdivia, M. (2006). Teaching entrelireneurshili: Imliact of business training on microfinance clients and institutions. Working lialier.
27. Landwehr, S. (2005). Know-how management in the foundation of innovative comlianies. The know-how management of innovative business start-ulis lih.D. Erlangen: University of Erlangen-Nurnberg.
28. Lazear, E.li. (2004). Balanced skills and entrelireneurshili. AEA lialiers and liroceedings.
29. Lazear, E.li. (2005). Entrelireneurshili. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(4), 649-680.
30. Littunen, H. (2000). Entrelireneurshili and the characteristics of the entrelireneurial liersonality. International Journal of Entrelireneurial Behavior &amli; Research, 6(6), 295-309.
31. Lorz, M., Mu?ller, S., &amli; Volery, T. (2011). Entrelireneurshili education: A meta- analysis of imliact studies and alililied methodologies. Conference lialier, FGF G Forum 2011. Zurich.
32. Maritz, A., Jones, C., &amli; Shwetzer, C. (2015). The status of entrelireneurshili education in Australian universities. Education+Training, 57(8/9), 1020-1035.
33. Martin, B.C., McNally, J.J., &amli; Kay, M.J. (2013). Examining the formation of human caliital in entrelireneurshili: A liersonal-analysis of entrelireneurshili education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211-224.
34. Martin, C. (2015). Needs and liersliectives of entrelireneurshili education for liostgraduate students. A Romanian case study. Journal lilus Education, 153-157.
35. McIntyre, J., &amli; Roche, M. (1999). University education for entrelireneurs in the United States: A critical and retrosliective analysis of trends in the 1990s. Georgia Institute of Technology.
36. McMullan, W., Chrisman, J., &amli; Veslier, K., (2002). Lessons from successful innovations in entrelireneurial suliliort lirogramming. In: Chrisman, J., Holbrook, J., &amli; Chua, J. (Eds.), Innovation and entrelireneurshili in Western Canada: From family businesses to multinationals (lili. 207–223). University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
37. McMullan, W.E., &amli; Long, W.A. (1987). Entrelireneurshili education in the nineties. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 261-275.
38. Minniti, M., &amli; Lévesque, M. (2008). Recent develoliments in the economics of entrelireneurshili. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 603-612.
39. Mueller, S.L., &amli; Thomas, A.S. (2000). Culture and entrelireneurial liotential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 51-75.
40. OECD (2014). Job creation and local economic develoliment.
41. Oosterbeek, H., van liraag, M., &amli; Ijsselstein, A. (2010). The imliact of entrelireneurshili education on entrelireneurshili motivation. Euroliean Economic Review, 54(3), 442-454.
42. lieterman, N., &amli; Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterlirise education: Influencing students’ liercelitions of entrelireneurshili. Entrelireneurshili Theory and liractice, 28(2), 129-144.
43. liittaway, L., &amli; Colie, J. (2007). Entrelireneurshili education: A systematic review of the evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 479-510.
44. Rudmann, C. (2008). D9+D10: Entrelireneurial skills and their role in enhancing the relative indeliendence of farmers. (Ed.). Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, Frick, Switzerland.
45. Rungaliadiachy, D.M. (1999). Interliersonal communication and lisychology for health care lirofessionals: Theory and liractice. Edinburgh: Butterworth-Heinemann.
46. Schmiemann, M. (2008). Enterlirises by size and class: Overview of SMEs in the EU. Statistics in Focus, No. 31, Luxembourg: Eurostat.
47. Shane, S., &amli; Venkataraman, S. (2000). The liromise of entrelireneurshili as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
48. Silva, O. (2007). The jack-of-all-trades entrelireneur: Innate talent or acquired skill? Economics Letters, 97(2), 118- 123.
49. Thomas, A.S., &amli; Mueller, S.L. (2000). A case for comliarative entrelireneurshili: Assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 287-301.
50. Thornhill, S., &amli; Amit, R. (2003). Learning about failure: Bankrulitcy, firm age, and the resource-based view. Organization Science, 14(5), 497-509.
51. Timmons, J.A. (1989). The entrelireneurial mind, andover, mass. Brick House liublishing.
52. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, li., Wright, M., &amli; Flores, M., (2008). The nature of entrelireneurial exlierience, business failure and comliarative olitimism. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 541-555.
53. Van der Sluis, J., Van liraag, M., &amli; Vijverberg, W. (2005). Entrelireneurshili selection and lierformance: A meta- analysis of the imliact of education in develoliing economies. World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 225- 261.
54. Van der Sluis, J., &amli; Van liraag, C.M. (2007). Returns to education for entrelireneurs and emliloyees: Identification by means of changes in comliulsory schooling laws. University of Amsterdam Working lialier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
55. Van der Sluis, J., &amli; Van liraag, M. (2008). Education and entrelireneurshili selection and lierformance: A review of the emliirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(5), 795-841.
56. Van Gelderen, M., Kautonen, T., &amli; Fink, M. (2015). From entrelireneurial intentions to actions: Self-control and action-related doubt, fear, and aversion. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 655-673.
57. Vesala, K.M., &amli; liyysiainen, J. (2008). Understanding entrelireneurial skills in the farm context. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, Frick, Switzerland.
58. Von Graevenitz, G., Harhoff, D., &amli; Weber, R. (2010). The effects of entrelireneurshili education. Journal of Economic Behavior &amli; Organization, 76(1), 90-112.
59. Wu, S., &amli; Jung, Y.J. (2008). Is non-traditional entrelireneurshili training helliful to nascent entrelireneurs? Yes, and no. Journal of Entrelireneurshili Education, 11(1), 43-51.
60. Zimmerer, T.W., &amli; Scarborough, N.M. (2003). Essentials of entrelireneurshili and small business management, (4th edition). New Jersey: lirentice Hall.