Author(s): Priyanka Sahoo
How did a situation (where many people get sick) translate to a serious money-based problem? Why did the spread of the coronavirus bring the world-wide process of people making, selling, and buying things to its knees? The answer lies in two methods by which coronavirus stopped money-based activities. First, the spread of the virus encouraged social distancing which led to the shutdown of related to managing money markets, related to big business offices, businesses and events. Second, the increasing more and more as time goes on rate at which the virus was spreading, and the increased doubt about how bad the situation could get, led to flight to safety in consumption and investment among people who use a product or service, people or businesses who give money to help start businesses and international trade partners. We focus on the period from the start of 2020 through March when the coronavirus began spreading into other countries and markets. We draw on real-world instances of watching, noticing, or making statements in testing/evaluating the serving to severely limit or control measures, money-based policy measures, money-related policy measures and the public health rules that were adopted during the period. We based on actual evidence examine the effect of social distancing policies on money-based activities and stock market indices. The findings show/tell about that the increasing number of lockdown days, money-based policy decisions and international travel restrictions very much affected the level of money-based activities and the closing, opening, lowest and highest stock price of major stock market indices.